06-12-2012, 10:43 AM
More to the story...
like... I was cooking crack in the basement? nope
I'm a wanted criminal? nope
Like we weren't paying for the property? nope
I wouldn't be here if there were "more" to the story. Their should be more to the story. I actually wish their was more to the story but their isn't.
This story is about employed members of a "Sheriff's Department" using it (a governmental agency) for personal gain at the expense of my family's constitutional civil rights.
Imagine if you will, going home tonight to find yourself locked out of your home. You call the police and they respond and tell you it's all cool and that someone had a right to lock you, your spouse and two minor children out of your own home and take everything you own in the home... (Beds, entertainment centers and equipment, dressers, appliances, etc, etc etc...)
What "more" does their need to be? What "more" could possibly justify a state action against your family? I have thought about this a lot! Their would be some scenarios that would have justified the actions of the state under color of law and of office but none of those would have happened outside the judicial system or judicial process with possibly one exception having to do with home land security and I assure the readers here that I am no leader of and wrongdoers looking to do harm to this country.
To my family, the effect has been the same as if our home burned to the ground and we didn't have insurance. Everything gone in an instant.
As a people, our most prized possessions are generally our home and it's contents. Gone in a flash... No police report, no court paperwork, no eviction, no due process but the "must be much more" stigma, even though their isn't "more" haunts us like no other.
After all... A Sheriff's Department would not seize your home without cause or justification right?
like... I was cooking crack in the basement? nope
I'm a wanted criminal? nope
Like we weren't paying for the property? nope
I wouldn't be here if there were "more" to the story. Their should be more to the story. I actually wish their was more to the story but their isn't.
This story is about employed members of a "Sheriff's Department" using it (a governmental agency) for personal gain at the expense of my family's constitutional civil rights.
Imagine if you will, going home tonight to find yourself locked out of your home. You call the police and they respond and tell you it's all cool and that someone had a right to lock you, your spouse and two minor children out of your own home and take everything you own in the home... (Beds, entertainment centers and equipment, dressers, appliances, etc, etc etc...)
What "more" does their need to be? What "more" could possibly justify a state action against your family? I have thought about this a lot! Their would be some scenarios that would have justified the actions of the state under color of law and of office but none of those would have happened outside the judicial system or judicial process with possibly one exception having to do with home land security and I assure the readers here that I am no leader of and wrongdoers looking to do harm to this country.
To my family, the effect has been the same as if our home burned to the ground and we didn't have insurance. Everything gone in an instant.
As a people, our most prized possessions are generally our home and it's contents. Gone in a flash... No police report, no court paperwork, no eviction, no due process but the "must be much more" stigma, even though their isn't "more" haunts us like no other.
After all... A Sheriff's Department would not seize your home without cause or justification right?