deadly force authorized against police in Indiana

[Disciple]

Part II

It was primarily written in response to an incident where a police officer was moonlighting as a home invader, stealing televisions and other electronics equipment from homes where he had responded to calls. As previously written, the law did not allow for individuals to shoot this police officer even though he was off duty, out of uniform, and committing home intrusion, circumstances under which any other person could be legally shot."

So a law was written to address an unusual scenario where one police officer was moonlighting as a home invader? Do we really need a law which might have a billion loopholes in it and cause undue harm to legitimate LE to address a case where a cop went rogue? Does anyone else see that as ludicrous?

That's fucking stupid

Ludicrous to refuse to forfeit your right to defend yourself against ANYONE who wants to rob, assault, rape or murder you in your home?

If you say so .....