YOUR SEXUALITY

[aussiefriend]

Jesus, aussie. You often refuse to provide facts/proof to support your stubborn sweeping (and, frequently, wrong) assertions during a serious discussion, and you've scoffed at those who provide them to you proactively or who request them of you. Now, you want scientific results from others to support what's common knowledge?

Oh piss off HoTD!

I work in health. You cannot make a blanket statement about a specific group of the population without backing it up with facts. That is called bigotry. Many of the perceptions are false and misleading in their prejudices against certain groups within a population. In order to prove your thesis you need to have evidence to explain your perception. I wouldn't use a source such as unicef. Whilst they do wonderful work, I wouldn't use them as a source if I was investigating the spread of the virus. Maybe something like the World Health Organisation, and I wouldn't just use one source, you need more than that to speak from a place of truth.

There is no doubt that the AIDS epidemic was/is a phenomenon. This would have been investigated and explored in detail in scientific based medical journals with actual facts and statistics. I know from working in the area of health that HIV+ has never been referred to as a gay disease. In fact, you could find yourself struck off or suspended if you started using that kind of language.

I am surprised at you supporting unsubstantiated hysterical hate filled homophobia. Then again, dogs are pack animals and you are sticking with the pack on this one.