04-01-2009, 07:18 PM
D Wrote:Well, I know they've been dropping, but I WOULD want a decent graphics card as well as new HDs (which I'm working on now). I dunno though... I *might* go quad-core. Depends on what's available when I get ready to buy.SyberBitch Wrote:Most likely. The average computer is really only made to last a couple of years at best. I tend to stay with my computer for several years though. The one I'm running now, I've had for... probably around 4 years I would guess. I'm about due for a 'new' system. Probably just a duo-core since the quads are still overblown on their pricing.They are? Obviously you've not been paying much attention :p
I can build a Quad Core AMD Phenom with a decent MOBO for under $300 right now. So there :p
Its only the video card thats gonna add to that, depending on what you want video wise.
Oh sure, that doesn't include a new monitor or anything... but even adding a decent flat panel you're only looking at about $80-$100 difference between Quad Core and Dual Core, and that increase is from both CPU and MOBO price differences.
Quote:EDIT: Forgot to mention I'm on the other side of the leaving it on all the time issue. I leave my systems (all 11 of them) on 24⁄7 and just turn off monitors. And some of these machines are OLD. I have a 486DX running. Though thats just used as a hardware firewallYeah, yeah... I've heard it before. I still say they last longer if you don't leave them running continuously. If nothing else, you'll burn through your power supplies every few years. The only problem I could see in turning your computer off vs leaving it on, would be if someone were turning off/on their computer like 10X/day. Then it would probably be better to just leave the damned thing on.