4 hours ago
(7 hours ago)username Wrote:(7 hours ago)rothschild Wrote:(8 hours ago)username Wrote:(9 hours ago)rothschild Wrote:(10 hours ago)username Wrote: Pull up the oldest world map u can find. Is that what ur looking for? Many countries didn’t exist (or exist as they are today) until they did. The U.S. included. Ya’ want everyone to just give back the land and sovereignty they’ve fought and died for over the last centuries? What’s ur point?
I'll simplify it: what is the principle that legitimizes independence?
Shut up. If you want to make a point, spit it out. I don’t have time, interest or inclination to answer ur stupid questions. This isn’t RC’s quiz show FFS.
If you can't answer a simple question that's fundamental to independence, what males you think you're capable of forming an educated opinion with respect to who violated Ukraine's sovereignty?
Why do you think I have any interest in answering your questions? As I said, spit out your opinions and I might or might not respond. Ur not a fucking teacher here and last time I checked I didn’t sign up for quizzes on Mock. It’s pretty fucking simple anyway. Of course Russia violated Ukraine’s sovereignty when they launched their invasion. Whether or not u think Ukraine deserved independence in the first place isn’t terribly relevant to me in this moment. So if u want to extrapolate on why u think they didn’t, by all means, post it up.
Have you never heard of self-determination?
Ukraine gained independence in 1991. It had self-determination until the coup in 2014, at which point it became a puppet state having no sovereignty. The new government was dependent on foreign economic and military support.
Euromaidan was the result of billions of US dollars that were invested in Ukraine since about 2004 for the purpose of bringing about a "color revolution". There were appr. 50 Western NGO's in Ukraine during the Euromaidan uprising. It was not the byproduct of self-determination, it was the result of foreign subversion of Ukraine's sovereignty. The conversation between Nuland and Pyatt Makes perfectly clear where Washington stands with respect to democracy, no ifs, ands or buts. This sorry chapter is indicative of Machiavellian ideals, not democratic ideals. It's indicative of a nation that's as morally contemptable as any other superpower.