05-20-2012, 05:58 PM
(05-20-2012, 05:42 PM)IMaDick Wrote:(05-20-2012, 05:36 PM)Disciple Wrote:(05-20-2012, 05:02 PM)IMaDick Wrote: I have to wonder what your definition of WMD's is?
I guess you are just stuck on nukes.
To me this is a weapon of mass destruction, and apparently there is no shortage of explosives in Iraq.
http://www.dnaindia.com/world/report_coo...ed_1678530
Nice attempt at revisionist history.
As you will recall, the two reasons given by the Bush administration for the invasion of Iraq were the presence of NUCLEAR and CHEMICAL WMDS and Saddam's support of Al Qaeda.
Both reported by Fox as factual.
Both absolute lies.
We should hang our heads in shame. Both for the harm we have done to Iraq, a nation we illegally invaded, but also (and more particularly) for the majority of citizens in this nation who believed the lies told by their government. Lies that make the Reichstag fire look ingeniously.
P.S. Somehow I doubt very much that you would be sitting around with your thumb up your ass if someone invaded OUR nation ....
Yeah I voted for the war before I voted against it.
Was it really just this nation? really?
Nice attempt at misdirection, you slippery devil!
Damned near.
A few small, mostly Eastern European nations, as I recall, joined the US. Certainly not the UN. The biggest exceptions I can think of are Spain (which pulled RIGHT THE FUCK OUT after their terrorist bombing) and Iceland.
Check it out, Dick. Post a list. Be sure to also let us know how many troops we sent and how many were from other nations.
If I'm wrong, I'm sure you'll let us know.