Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
revolutionary war myths
#21
I don't claim, as a fact, that the United States of America is the best country in the world; it's subjective. I personally wouldn't choose to permanently live anywhere else and I do value the freedoms that we are afforded here. They didn't come cheap and are largely a result of the blood shed by those in the Revolutionary War.

So, that makes me a patriot, proudly. I'd likely feel the same patriotism if I lived in the UK or Australia, as well. Australians, British, Americans - we all have a good deal of personal freedoms and national independence - there's every reason to be grateful for the sacrifices of those past and present who fought to make that possible, as far as I'm concerned.

But, I'll go ahead and play your alleged "kool-aid" game, CN. My responses to your OP are in bold below.

1 - the war was between the colonists and the British - myth - it was actually a proxy war between the British and French.
HOTD: change the word "actually" to "also" and I'd agree without other qualifications.
However, I've never been taught any "myth" down playing or minimizing the French role in the Revolutionary War.


2 - Molly Pitcher cannon heroine - myth - nice story shame it was completely made up.
HOTD: Never was taught this as part of American or World History; only ever heard of it as a story.

3 - the Americans won the war with frontier savvy and guerilla tactics - myth - sounds great not true though.
HOTD: Based on my education (I'm not a war buff or expert by any means), I think that frontier savvy definitely played a role in America's victory over the British. To discount home court advantage is a ridiculous minimization of its importance strategically, IMO.

Regarding guerilla tactics, I never was taught this "myth" as part of American or World History. If it is indeed a "myth", it's not one that's widespread enough to have hit my radar or registered.


4 - except for a few loyallists most Americans fought for liberty - myth - the number of loyallists and rebels was actually almost even. In fact there were 3 sides in the war not 2.
HOTD: There are always multiple agendas and parties in every war. Always have been, always will be, IMO. I don't have reason to doubt that there were almost an equal number of loyalists as there were "rebels", and other factions in the mix as well. I've never researched nor recall coming across statistics to support the "almost equal" contention, but wouldn't surprise me if that was accurate. But, AGAIN, I've never been taught any "myth" to the contrary.

5 - the colonists defeated the mightiest army of all time - myth - the colonists massively outnumbered and outgunned the British.
HOTD: This one seems like it was written by a sore loser. War; defeat is defeat and victory is victory. It doesn't matter a wit if that victory was a result of the opposing side underestimating the size of its opponent, their allies, or their artillery power. The British having made a lot of strategic and tactical errors in their bid for control of the colonies is a recognized fact; a fact which in no way diminishes Americas victory in securing its independence.

I've never been taught that the British army is "the mightiest army of all time". I won't argue that it isn't. Let's just agree that it is/was; the fact that American forces and our allies were able to massively outnumber and outgun such a worthy opponent is all the more reason to feel patriotic and thankful for those who fought for our independence against the worthiest of all opponents.

--------------------------------------------------------

I can't speak for others and what they were taught/read in regards to the Revolutionary War.

But, just based on my own public education here in the US, I suspect that the "kool-aid drinkers" are actually those who insist that all Americans believe some watered down piece of fiction as history because they read such an implication on Cracked.com.

All history contains some myths and it's not always possible to differentiate them from the facts. But, the myths in your article were never presented as facts to me. Maybe someone else here was taught differently though and will weigh in.
Reply
#22
(12-28-2013, 01:21 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: HOTD: change the word "actually" to "also" and I'd agree without others qualifications.
However, I've never been taught any "myth" down playing or minimizing the French role in the Revolutionary War.


Sorry, no French, no guns or ammo for the colonists = no revolutionary war. Its really as simple as that, without French aid the colonists wouldn't have been able to fight a war never mind win one. In the past at Mock I have sometimes commented on how the colonists would never have won without the French only to be drowned out by retards saying drivel like “we would have kicked your ass anyway!”. No not without French guns and ammo and superior numbers you wouldn't dickhead.

HOTD: Never was taught this as part of American or World History; only ever heard of it as a story.

The story of Pitcher has been taught as fact in many American schools for decades. She is just a propaganda myth that somehow became a true story. A female revolutionry figurehead invented for women to admire.

HOTD: Based on my education (I'm not a war buff or expert by any means), I think that frontier savvy definitely played a role in America's victory over the British. To discount home court advantage is a ridiculous minimization of its importance strategically, IMO.

Regarding guerilla tactics, I never was taught this "myth" as part of American or World History. If it is indeed a "myth", it's not one that's widespread enough to have hit my radar or registered.


There was no “frontier savvy” in standing in ranks exchanging volleys of gunfire. The fact the colonists had more men with more guns was the deciding factor not “frontier savvy”. The whole notion that the colonists faught “smarter” is also a myth.

HOTD: There are always multiple agendas and parties in every war. Always have been, always will be, IMO. I don't have reason to doubt that there were almost an equal number of loyalists as there were "rebels", and other factions in the mix as well. I've never researched or recall coming across statistics to support the "almost equal" contention, but wouldn't surprise me if that was accurate. But, AGAIN, I've never been taught any "myth" to the contrary.

The fact is “most” colonists either were for the king or didn't give as a toss and just wanted a quiet life. The whole idea that an entire nation rose up as one to fight is a very common myth tauted around.

HOTD: This one seems like it was written by a sore loser. War; defeat is defeat and victory is victory. It doesn't matter a wit if that victory was a result of the opposing side underestimating the size of its opponent, their allies, or their artillery power. The British having made a lot of strategic and tactical errors in their bid for control of the colonies is a recognized fact; a fact which in no way diminishes Americas victory in securing its independence.

I've never been taught that the British army is "the mightiest army of all time". I won't argue that it isn't. Let's just agree that it is/was; the fact that American forces and our allies were able to massively outnumber and outgun such a worthy opponent is all the more reason to feel patriotic and thankful for those who fought for our independence against the worthiest of all opponents.


Sore loser? How about deluded winner?History is written by the victor, as true in the revolutionary war as any other. True patriotic victors investigate it and question it, plastic patriots swallow it whole like mana from heaven.

Cracked.com.

If you don't like the info attack the source! If I read something on Fox news or MSNBC I would check Cracked to make sure it was true. Cracked maybe just a bit of fun but they deal with serious subjects as well like the revolutionary war.

All history contains some myths and it's not always possible to differentiate them from the facts. But, the myths in your article were never presented as facts to me. Maybe someone else here was taught differently though and will weigh in.


I believe you of course, millions wouldn't. Some people out there, often referred to as cynics, might think to themselves “she's going to deny being taught any of these myths regardless of what they are and how common they are and how many Americans believe them!”. Plausable deniability.
We need to punish the French, ignore the Germans and forgive the Russians - Condoleezza Rice.
Reply
#23
(12-28-2013, 01:21 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: I don't claim, as a fact, that the United States of America is the best country in the world

Which makes you almost unique as an American.

When Americans say that America is the best country in the world there is no subjectivety at all, its a fact. The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth your honour.
We need to punish the French, ignore the Germans and forgive the Russians - Condoleezza Rice.
Reply
#24
I'm not gonna try to read that mess, CN. I read your last paragraph inside the bottom of the quote box.

I gave you my honest answers, as you solicited. I didn't research or try to refute the facts listed in your source, so you got what I was taught and what I believe in a quick response. I don't think there's a point to any further investment on my part.

America won its independence from the British - many of us are grateful for those who sacrificed their lives to make that possible (that includes French fatalities as well). Why anyone would suggest that patriotism is a negative quality, beats the shit outta me. But, a couple of you here seem to have a problem with it and I think it's just that - your problem and not really a concern.

I have no idea who or how the "myths" in the article were qualified as ones that all Americans believe to be historical fact. I can't say that no Americans believe them to be such. I can't say that most Americans believe them to be such. I can only tell you that this American didn't believe them to be historical facts in the first place.

I also never believed the myth, started right here on Mock and argued with great passion, that "Italy never had an empire" (even if the "Roman Empire" is removed from the equation, I know that to be a historically false statement). Maybe I just have a good myth sniffer-outter.

In the end, I think your perceptions of what qualifies as "fact" differ from mine; no sense in going round in circles with you about it.
Reply
#25
(12-28-2013, 02:22 PM)Cynical Ninja Wrote:
(12-28-2013, 01:21 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: I don't claim, as a fact, that the United States of America is the best country in the world

Which makes you almost unique as an American.

When Americans say that America is the best country in the world there is no subjectivety at all, its a fact. The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth your honour.


I claim it! hah
[Image: Zy3rKpW.png]
Reply
#26
(12-28-2013, 02:58 PM)Duchess Wrote:
(12-28-2013, 02:22 PM)Cynical Ninja Wrote:
(12-28-2013, 01:21 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: I don't claim, as a fact, that the United States of America is the best country in the world

Which makes you almost unique as an American.

When Americans say that America is the best country in the world there is no subjectivety at all, its a fact. The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth your honour.


I claim it! hah
Pretty Much, Yep
Reply
#27
Well, I've been witness to this one man mission to 'correct history' and convert Americans to non-patriots for at least the last 5 years...

Number of Americans converted = 0

Americans 1
Cinnamon 0
“Two billion people will perish globally due to being vaccinated against Corona virus” - rothschild, August 2021
Reply
#28
Well he did admit he had no ambition to take a bullet for anyone. Limeys are like that though. Pushing others into the line of fire and all. Hiding behind the fat lady then pointing a finger at everyone else. Its expected so I'm not surprised. hah No wonder they lost the war.
He ain't heavy, he's my brother.
Reply
#29
I remember a year ago or so in a WWII thread I had to refer to CN and Aussiebitch as Fucknut #1 and Fucknut #2.

Good times!
Reply
#30
(12-28-2013, 07:03 PM)Midwest Spy Wrote: I remember a year ago or so in a WWII thread I had to refer to CN and Aussiebitch as Fucknut #1 and Fucknut #2.

Good times!

Watch your mouth you poster child for the 'Be Kind to Retards Week'! I mean, it's not even your own original material here.

You are the biggest Fucknut I have ever come across on Planet Earth. So take your patriotism and shove it up your retarded arse!
Reply