Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Hey Frank, Clancy's got a question for you
#21
LuMPyPussy Wrote:
jackboots Wrote:Hi Clancy! ::wave::

i loved the montage of photos of Scotland you sent me! 75
Isn't he a handsome little devil?
Very ::bigg::

Hi Clancy42
I would stop eating chocolate.. but I'm not a quitter!








:B
Reply
#22
jackboots Wrote:what is the solution? i don't know.
Training.
Reply
#23
Middle Finger Wrote:In addition, taking away a basic right and principle of freedom because some can't or don't use it well or at all is not a valid reason to take it away from responsible citizens.
I don't think JB is suggesting that these citizens should lose the right to have a firearm if they so desire, I think she is simply saying that she would advise such people against it.
Reply
#24
In my view, a firearm possibly being taken away and used against you is an invalid reason to not own, or to be for someone not owning, a firearm. It's so extremely unlikely, it is easily dwarfed by the odds of it being of use to the person urgently needing to defend their safety or freedom.
86 112
Reply
#25
SyberBitch Wrote:
Middle Finger Wrote:In addition, taking away a basic right and principle of freedom because some can't or don't use it well or at all is not a valid reason to take it away from responsible citizens.
I don't think JB is suggesting that these citizens should lose the right to have a firearm if they so desire, I think she is simply saying that she would advise such people against it.
you are absolutely right. not everyone can handle it.

















































Reply