Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 2 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
RIGHT TO BARE ALL
#1
I don't mind naked people, anywhere, really - no matter what they look like. But, I think these protestors are showing their assess, in more ways than one.

You can strip down for certain parades, fairs, etc... in SF. There's a nude beach close by and nudist colonies not far from the city. You can hang out with your friends naked as can be at your private residence and no one can stop you... While not being able to walk around naked on public streets and in businesses is a violation of freedom of expression to some degree (I actually agree with the protestors on that), the ordinance against it is a reasonable one for safety and societal purposes and these protestors should just let it go already.

Here's the story:
(CNN) -- San Francisco residents who like to relax around town naked will have to keep their pants on.

The city's Board of Supervisors approved a public nudity ban Tuesday in a 6-5 vote.

As soon as the measure passed, some protesters inside City Hall tore off their clothes. Authorities draped them in blue blankets and led them away.

Supervisor Scott Wiener, who introduced the ordinance, disputed claims that the measure violates freedom of expression.

"We're a city that believes in freedom, and we've always believed in freedom and free expression," Wiener told CNN affilite KGO. "But taking your pants off at Castro and Market and displaying your genitals to everyone, that's not free expression."

But some nudists have filed a lawsuit claiming the ban violates their First Amendment rights.

"Is the First Amendment more powerful and more important than the passions of an intolerant mob and the ambitions of one or more city supervisors? We would contend that it is, and that's what our case is based upon," the nudists' attorney, Christina DiEdoardo, told KGO.

The ban does not apply at "permitted parades, fairs and festivals."

Otherwise, those caught naked in public could face fines of $100 to $500, depending on the number of prior offenses. A person who violates the ordinance three times in a year could also face one year in jail.


http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/21/us/califor...hpt=us_mid
Reply
#2


I can't help but question why people would fight for the right to be naked in public.
[Image: Zy3rKpW.png]
Reply
#3
Me too Duchess. There is a time and place for everything but it is NOT necessary to be nakes at the market. No one needs to see that shit.
Devil Money Stealing Aunt Smiley_emoticons_fies
Reply
#4
Naked is overrated.....I would rather use my imagination.
Reply
#5
(11-23-2012, 12:37 PM)Sphincter Cop Wrote: Naked is overrated.....I would rather use my imagination.

True. Sometimes you come across people and just can't help but imagine them naked.

Conversely, I've come across come some nudists while out and about and just couldn't help imagining them clothed. Smiley_emoticons_smile
Reply
#6
This couldn't be happening anywhere other than SF. hah

I agree HotD. I hope they lose if they pursue it.
Commando Cunt Queen
Reply
#7
Its OK to be gay and naked but not hetero and naked. hah
He ain't heavy, he's my brother.
Reply
#8
(11-24-2012, 12:47 PM)Maggot Wrote: Its OK to be gay and naked but not hetero and naked. hah

Oh contraire mon frere.

If you'd come to visit before the ordinance was passed this week, there could have been a naked Maggot, Hairy Dog, and User frolicking throughout the park and nobody could have done a damn thing to stop us (legally, anyway)! Smiley_emoticons_razz
Reply
#9
(11-24-2012, 01:26 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: there could have been a naked Maggot, Hairy Dog, and User frolicking throughout the park


Picture THAT!
[Image: Zy3rKpW.png]
Reply
#10
(11-24-2012, 12:47 PM)Maggot Wrote: Its OK to be gay and naked but not hetero and naked. hah

Well, we (gays) look good naked....FACT

Sorry lesbos......
Reply
#11
Can I wear a kilt? A necktie? A belt?............shrubs?
He ain't heavy, he's my brother.
Reply
#12
1 Fig Leaf (which I'm told looks a lot like poison oak shrub). Smiley_emoticons_fies
Reply
#13
The nudists aren't giving up without a fight, damn it!!! I really wish not being able to wander around nude was my biggest concern in life.

Hell, if it weren't for the negative impact on businesses, WGAF if they're naked? It's San Francisco, naked people aren't the most controversial thing on display. But, their presence in front of Castro restaurants and shops does deter business and that's not fair to the business owners. That's a major reason that the ban was passed.

It seems like this nudist group whose lawyer is tying up the court to appeal the public nudity ban (or collect on a civil suit for violation of freedom of expression) is comprised of just a handful of people. I've only ever seen the same few of them out and about. It's been freakin' freezing here in the mornings, but the two devoted crusaders pictured below still protested outside the federal building yesterday for their rights to mosey about without having to cover their "genitals, perineum, and anal regions".

The judge is expected to respond to the request to overturn the ban by end of the month. If the appeal doesn't pan out, the new public nudity ban goes into effect Feb. 1st.

[Image: 914-1pVcNi.Em.55.jpeg]

Crazy characters...
Reply
#14
Imagine living in tra-la-la land and having nothing better to do than standing naked in a park looking defiant, and posing for animal crackers.
He ain't heavy, he's my brother.
Reply