HILLARY FOR PRESIDENT

[Carsman]

She's driving off the cliff as fast as she can. Go Hillary Go!

[F.U.]

Seen this and thought you may like it Pyropappy.

[pyropappy]

Wipewater. I like this one too.

[aussiefriend]

I don't understand why you are all hating on this woman. Is it because you are all right wing and just enjoy bashing this gal? None of you seem to be independent thinkers. There is no one here speaking for this woman, because they are afraid of your aggressive backlash. Such hatred and loathing.

You're going to have to do better than a random picture taken who knows when...

...although there will be those who firmly believe that it's just exactly as you say. Cyberspace is filled with them.

In Australia, we call that 'pissweak'

[Duchess]

Aussie, haven't you ever heard about the Clinton hate in America? Bill & Hillary are loathed, absolutely hated by a mass of people here. I don't think I can recall a time when it wasn't like that. Bill was the first President I voted for. I still love him to pieces, I don't give a rip that he can't keep it in his pants.

[HairOfTheDog]

There is no one here speaking for this woman, because they are afraid of your aggressive backlash.

Are you serious aussie?

Worse things get hurled at me for mocking highly mockable personal posts and aggressively challenging what I consider social and political bullshit here, when I feel like it. That predictable backlash isn't a deterrent, nor is it fear-invoking.

Anyway, I doubt Hillary Clinton is losing any sleep over the truly hateful and loathing among her detractors; they've been slinging shit her way for decades and they'd never be in her potential voter base anyway. She has her consummate detractors. And, she has her ardent defenders. And, there are some of us who are mostly neutral about her and her platform. It's nothing new.

[pyropappy]

I don't understand why you are all hating on this woman. Is it because you are all right wing and just enjoy bashing this gal? None of you seem to be independent thinkers. There is no one here speaking for this woman, because they are afraid of your aggressive backlash. Such hatred and loathing.

You're going to have to do better than a random picture taken who knows when...

...although there will be those who firmly believe that it's just exactly as you say. Cyberspace is filled with them.

In Australia, we call that 'pissweak'

list of liesand scandals

take your pick; pack a lunch

[Carsman]

I don't understand why you are all hating on this woman. Is it because you are all right wing and just enjoy bashing this gal? None of you seem to be independent thinkers. There is no one here speaking for this woman, because they are afraid of your aggressive backlash. Such hatred and loathing.

You're going to have to do better than a random picture taken who knows when...

...although there will be those who firmly believe that it's just exactly as you say. Cyberspace is filled with them.

In Australia, we call that 'pissweak'

You have to know her to love her, or to dislike her.

[aussiefriend]

No Duch, haven't heard about Clinton Hate until now. Also HoTD, you are the queen of Rhetorical Questions, you should form a band.

[Duchess]

No Duch, haven't heard about Clinton Hate until now.

There are some people who can't even hear the Clinton name without it making their head spin. I know some of them.

[HairOfTheDog]

That one wasn't rhetorical Aussie.

I really wondered if you seriously think people are afraid to speak their minds and disagree with right wing or majority assertions here.

I don't think so and I know I'm not, but maybe there are some closeted Hillary lovers who are just itching to bust out.


(About me starting a band, are you mad? That one is rhetorical. )

[sally]

I actually like Hillary, I just don't care enough to come in here and star arguing with nut cases like Pyropappy and whoever else here hates her. Same thing with the Obama haters, President Obama has done nothing to negatively affect my life. People who get so worked up over him puzzle me.

[Duchess]

I really wish she hadn't apologized for that fricken email server. I would have advised against it.

I edited the smiley out of my post. I shouldn't have laughed but I was amused by the thought of advising Hillary on anything.

[Maggot]

Time will tell and history will be written. Its the mighty snowball in the summer sun, when politicians begin to run, the peanut gallery has a ton of fun. Its not like the hate is real, its just that the ones that make our laws have to be willing to own their flaws. If they are expected to lead they better not show their greed its the first thing we see and the last thing we remember.

[pyropappy]

[HairOfTheDog]

Hillary Clinton is by far the most qualified candidate for the presidency, from either party, in terms of experience. Right now, to me, her platform is also the most palatable.

She may be too traditional politically to be elected now though; the public seems to be fed up with career politicians and establishment types. But, the 2016 election is still more than a year away and public sentiment can change a lot between now and then and when push comes to shove.

Of course the far right wing and the RNC engage in efforts to knock Hillary out of the running, that's undeniable and part of the competitive political climate. Unfortunately, in my opinion, Hillary and her camp haven't managed the barrage of allegations against her well so far, and some of her actions and words only add fuel to the fire.

If she can turn that around in the next 14 months and gets elected president, it will be interesting to watch the true Hillary haters blow their effin' tops.

[Carsman]

I'm not a Hillary lover, nor am I really I Hillary hater, I do like some of her platform stand. However, I am concerned if she really can be trusted, actually that's a rhetorical question, she's a politician!

The Donald is a blowhard, however, he's a breath of fresh air political blowhard, saying what many constituents feel and want to hear.
(Can't wait for the next debate 9-16, S/B very interesting!)

[Duchess]

The DOJ said she had the authority to delete her emails but I'm not seeing that headline anywhere this weekend.

[HairOfTheDog]

The DOJ said she had the authority to delete her emails but I'm not seeing that headline anywhere this weekend.

Your eyesight is fading, you decrepit, old, man-handed wildebeest.

Here you go: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/12/us/jus....html?_r=0

“There is no question that former Secretary Clinton had authority to delete personal emails without agency supervision — she appropriately could have done so even if she were working on a government server,” the filing said. “Under policies issue both by the National Archives and Records Administration and the State Department, individual officers and employees are permitted and expected to exercise judgment to determine what constitutes a federal record.”

Of course, ^ that won't stop some from claiming that the emails she deleted were actually related to governmental business, even though there's apparently no evidence to support such an allegation.

[Duchess]

Your eyesight is fading, you decrepit, old, man-handed wildebeest.

Smooth talker