Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 4 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Dear @username: Warning Request
#41
(07-16-2012, 09:57 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote:
(07-16-2012, 09:54 PM)krystalshores Wrote: Ok then, let's see.

I think you should give HotRat a warning for whining about such frivolous things as she has. Wasting your precious time as Mock Neighborhood Watch Leader.

If you don't make an example, everyone will flood you with their petty complaints. You'll never get any sleep, you won't have time to go to the gym. You'll
Probably end up warning some poor Joe that's just walking around drinking tea and eating skittles. ALL BECAUSE HotD CRIED WOLF!

I PLEAD GUILTY AS CHARGED!

Awe, I kind of feel bad now.














You know I was mostly just kidding right?
Blowing-kisses
Reply
#42
(07-16-2012, 09:54 PM)krystalshores Wrote: Ok then, let's see.

I think you should give HotRat a warning for whining about such frivolous things as she has. Wasting your precious time as Mock Neighborhood Watch Leader.

If you don't make an example, everyone will flood you with their petty complaints. You'll never get any sleep, you won't have time to go to the gym. You'll
Probably end up warning some poor Joe that's just walking around drinking tea and eating skittles. ALL BECAUSE HotD CRIED WOLF!

You're filing a petty complaint that I warn HotD so I don't get more petty complaints? Just checking.

hah
Reply
#43
(07-16-2012, 10:01 PM)Ma Huang Sor Wrote:
(07-16-2012, 09:08 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote:
(07-16-2012, 08:59 PM)krystalshores Wrote:
(07-16-2012, 08:50 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: I would like to be a character witness for aussie, but I'm still pressing forward with the warning request, for her own good and that of the board. Best to nip it in the bud.

CHARACTER WITNESS STATEMENT ON BEHALF OF AUSSIEFRIEND

BY: HairOfTheDog 7/16/12
I've known aussiefriend for almost a year now. She has a good sense of humor and a kind heart. She's also a tough cookie with a fighting spirit. As MS pointed out, she also has a very lovely face.

As I said, it pains me to file this motion, but I felt the number of infractions was mounting and it is my duty as a MOCK citizen to report to the approrpriate authorities. See you in MOCK court.

Thank you.

You are such a rat, HotD.



Of course you know that I'm playing because I adore aussiefriend. If you don't realize that, a warning may be in order for you!

She'll get a fair trial, I'm sure of it.

::resosance::

WTF is resosance?
Reply
#44
Yeah, pretty much. I thought you might see it that way.

See its already started.

hah
Reply
#45
I'd like to handle the sentencing portion for these fine ladies...err, I mean forum rabble rousers.
Reply
#46
(07-16-2012, 11:07 PM)krystalshores Wrote: You know I was mostly just kidding right?
Blowing-kisses

Of course! hah
Reply
#47
Mostly?
Reply
#48
WTF is resosance?

It's a New Word for you to use.

Resonance occurs when a system is able to store and easily transfer energy between two or more different storage modes (such as kinetic energy and potential energy in the case of a pendulum). However, there are some losses from cycle to cycle, called damping. When damping is small, the resonant frequency is approximately equal to the natural frequency of the system, which is a frequency of unforced vibrations. Some systems have multiple, distinct, resonant frequencies.

In layman's terms a kind of vibrational echo.
Reply
#49
Well, I'm still not quite sure what the implication to the post was, but I do understand what it means for a vibration or message to "resonate".

Sometimes I feel like I need a translator or decoder ring here lately, then I realize it probably won't matter a few posts from now. hah
Reply
#50
(07-17-2012, 01:16 AM)Riotgear Wrote: Mostly?

I think maybe KS realizes that I was being serious about one of the alleged infractions that I posted; we need more celebrity hair critiques in this place. Smiley_emoticons_razz
Reply
#51
(07-17-2012, 11:48 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Well, I'm still not quite sure what the implication to the post was, but I do understand what it means for a vibration or message to "resonate".

Sometimes I feel like I need a translator or decoder ring here lately, then I realize it probably won't matter a few posts from now. hah

It just means somebody broke out the extra fancy asskissing, the kind with the little tongue swirl swooshy move at the end. Shut up and enjoy it lolol.
Reply
#52
(07-17-2012, 11:48 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Well, I'm still not quite sure what the implication to the post was, but I do understand what it means for a vibration or message to "resonate".

Sometimes I feel like I need a translator or decoder ring here lately, then I realize it probably won't matter a few posts from now. hah

It means I shouldn't respond to your posts after my second glass of wine, mostly.

Blowing-kisses
Reply
#53
Oh hey look - It's the 'second glass of wine' excuse making yet another appearance.
Reply
#54
(07-16-2012, 08:06 PM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: Dear @username,

As you are now the official "warner" and I can't do it myself, please review my request for poster warning. I will respect your decision.

Thank you, in advance, for your timely consideration.

===========================================

REQUEST FOR MOCK POSTER WARNING

POSTER NAME:
aussiefriend

INFRACTIONS ALLEGED:
1. blatant misquoting,
2. false implications and attempting to start rumors,
3. failure to give hair critiques on asshole celebrities in a timely manner despite her self-attributed high-falutin title,
4. projecting onto others,
5. being mean when commenting about the Octomom; a struggling single mother of 14 just trying to make ends meet.

While I very much like aussiefriend and regret having to take such drastic action, there is the serious and kindly nature of the board at stake.

Please keep this confidential.


hah

UPDATE: I'd like to formally cancel out all complaints listed above. They are no longer valid (well, they never really were valid, haha).

BUT, for consideration, some truly valid potential warnings may have since emerged - thusly:

(1.) Dangerously hilarious drunken posting.
(2.) Dangerously unhilarious drunken posting.
(3.) Obsessing about shit related to other posters obsessing about shit related to other posters.

I'm personally in camps (1) and (3), but will trust the Mock authorities to move forward (or not) as they see fit.

Sincerely,
HairOfTheDog
Reply
#55
(07-16-2012, 11:15 PM)Jimbone Wrote: I'd like to handle the sentencing portion for these fine ladies...err, I mean forum rabble rousers.

I'd like to hear what sentencing Mr. Bone has in mind for the female posters in this thread - namely: aussie, sally, krystal, username, and Hairy (I left Maggot, Donovan and OBK out because I do believe 100% that they are physically "male").
Reply
#56
(09-15-2012, 12:18 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: UPDATE: I'd like to formally cancel out all complaints listed above. They are no longer valid (well, they never really were valid, haha).

BUT, for consideration, some truly valid potential warnings may have since emerged - thusly:

(1.) Dangerously hilarious drunken posting.
(2.) Dangerously unhilarious drunken posting.
(3.) Obsessing about shit related to other posters obsessing about shit related to other posters.

I'm personally in camps (1) and (3), but will trust the Mock authorities to move forward (or not) as they see fit.

Sincerely,
HairOfTheDog

While I like #2 very much, Aussie was cited and warned yesterday for Drunk & Disorderly Conduct in Mock and PWI.

With all her botox, I think punishment should include attempting to raise her eyebrows at least a half inch and posting a picture.
Reply
#57
(09-15-2012, 01:32 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote:
(07-16-2012, 11:15 PM)Jimbone Wrote: I'd like to handle the sentencing portion for these fine ladies...err, I mean forum rabble rousers.

I'd like to hear what sentencing Mr. Bone has in mind for the female posters in this thread - namely: aussie, sally, krystal, username, and Hairy (I left Maggot, Donovan and OBK out because I do believe 100% that they are physically "male").

Lemme check..................Yup, still attached.
He ain't heavy, he's my brother.
Reply