Mock

(03-27-2022, 04:21 AM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]Once confirmed, she will be the most qualified justice to sit on the SCOTUS. That's a fact.

No one's questioning that she's got liberal qualifications.

(03-27-2022, 04:21 AM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]Once confirmed, she will be the most qualified justice to sit on the SCOTUS. That's a fact.

Have you reviewed her judicial record or are you just talking out of your ass as usual? Please give me some reasons why that is a fact.

I'm sure you can do your own research.

The Constitution does not specify qualifications for Justices such as age, education, profession, or native-born citizenship. A Justice does not have to be a lawyer or a law school graduate, but all Justices have been trained in the law.

https://ballotpedia.org/Ketanji_Brown_Jackson

She went to Harvard Law
and

2021-present: Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
2013-2021: Judge, United States District Court for the District of Columbia
2010-2014: Vice chair/Commissioner, United States Sentencing Commission
2007-2010: Of counsel (Private practice), Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, D.C.
2005-2007: Assistant federal public defender, Office of the Federal Public Defender
2003-2005: Assistant special counsel, United States Sentencing Commission
2002-2003: Associate, The Feinberg Group, LLP
2000-2002: Associate, Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston, Mass.
1999-2000: Law clerk, Hon. Stephen Breyer, Supreme Court of the United States
1998-1999: Associate, Miller, Cassidy, Larroca & Lewin LLP, Washington, D.C.
1997-1998: Law clerk, Hon. Bruce Marshall Selya, U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1^st Circuit
1996-1997: Law clerk, Hon. Patti Saris, U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts[26]

(03-27-2022, 01:56 PM)sally Wrote: [ -> ]Have you reviewed her judicial record or are you just talking out of your ass as usual? Please give me some reasons why that is a fact.

Sally, seriously? There is a plethora of information out there showing her experience as compared to the other justices. It would be really easy to find if you took the time to look.

You say that same thing everytime someone questions anything you say. I want you to explain why you think she is the most qualified in your own words. If you're going to claim something then you should be able to back it up. Telling someone to just go look it up holds no water, you need to be able to explain your position otherwise everyone just thinks you're stupid. They teach this shit in grade school, show your thinking. You can't just tell the teacher I'm right because I said so and go look it up.

I did it and I gave you a reason why I do not think she is the best qualified, but obviously you are not able to do the same. We have differences of opinions and I'm able to express mine, but you can't. Your excuse is always to just go look it up. If you're doing your homework as you claim then just give me one paragraph in your own words why she is the most qualified. It should be easy enough, right? Mirah can't do it either, all she could do is list her credentials. Millions of people have prestigious backgrounds, so what?

(03-27-2022, 06:02 PM)sally Wrote: [ -> ]I did it and I gave you a reason why I do not think she is the best qualified, but obviously you are not able to do the same. We have differences of opinions and I'm able to express mine, but you can't. Your excuse is always to just go look it up. If you're doing your homework as you claim then just give me one paragraph in your own words why she is the most qualified. It should be easy enough, right? Mirah can't do it either, all she could do is list her credentials. Millions of people have prestigious backgrounds, so what?

I think she will bring some balance to the court.