Mock

Full Version: POLITICAL HUMOR & SATIRE
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
(10-05-2022, 12:43 PM)MirahM Wrote: [ -> ]Corruption Corruption Corruption!
Corruption is normal!
All sides are bad!
Everything everywhere is fucked
Corruption Corruption Corruption!

I watched some of the Iran-Contra hearings, and saw the corruption on both sides of the aisle. Were you even born then? Smiley_emoticons_skeptisch
Not answering that.

I am just amazed daily at your extent of knowledge and witnessing of events.
(10-05-2022, 04:21 AM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-04-2022, 08:57 PM)rothschild Wrote: [ -> ]Trump is so politicized -- partly his own fault, not entirely -- that anyone who associates with him runs a fairly substantial risk of government retaliation. This has happened before over the last 100 years.

Oh for fucks sake. get over yourself. Politicized my ass. If they weren't doing questionable things they all wouldn't be needing lawyers.


Rudy Giuliani--lost his license to practice because of election fraud claims.

Sidney Powell--under investigation for overseeing an effort to copy sensitive election data and coordinating a breach in Georgia election files.

John Eastman--asked former VP  to break the law and halt the proceedings to certify the 2020 election.

Christina Bobb--signed a letter attesting that a diligent search had been conducted and all stolen material that had been at MAL had been returned to the government. That was a lie and she knew it.

Michael Cohen went to prison for things he did at trump's direction.

Every single thing these lawyers got in trouble for are things they did at the direction of trump. They are adults with free will and they find themselves in this position because of the actions they undertook.

And Epstein didn't kill himself!
[Image: FeXkwkNXEAI9ZUg?format=jpg&name=small]
That’s why lawyers need lawyers.  hah
Isn't it kind of obvious that a system of law cannot function impartially in that kind of environment?

I guess not.
[Image: FffIvGnUAAAuhLi?format=jpg&name=small]
Heh


[Image: FfewIsUaUAEjVz7?format=png&name=small]
(10-22-2022, 06:58 AM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]Heh


[Image: FfewIsUaUAEjVz7?format=png&name=small]

hah
(10-22-2022, 06:58 AM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]Heh


[Image: FfewIsUaUAEjVz7?format=png&name=small]


I have a fear of being taxed to death.    #occupylogic.
You have to wonder about people who identify with propaganda.
How is that propaganda? 
(10-24-2022, 11:50 AM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]How is that propaganda? 

Study a resource for logical fallacies and then go back and see how many you can find in that meme.

Understanding fallacies is prerequiste to thinking critically. If you don't understand informal logic, you cannot think critically.

The definition for propaganda is: the manipulation of symbols for the purpose of eliciting a desired response.

You still need to understand the fallacies to be able to think critically, however. And you have to have a earnest desire to see truth regardless of what it turns out to be, which means abandoning all preconceptions.
(10-24-2022, 11:43 AM)rothschild Wrote: [ -> ]You have to wonder about people who identify with propaganda.

You have to wonder about people who identify with conspiracy theories. Tin+foil+hat+smiley
(10-24-2022, 12:39 PM)Clang McFly Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-24-2022, 11:43 AM)rothschild Wrote: [ -> ]You have to wonder about people who identify with propaganda.

You have to wonder about people who identify with conspiracy theories. Tin+foil+hat+smiley

Are you throwing mud, or flinging poop?
(10-24-2022, 12:44 PM)rothschild Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-24-2022, 12:39 PM)Clang McFly Wrote: [ -> ]
(10-24-2022, 11:43 AM)rothschild Wrote: [ -> ]You have to wonder about people who identify with propaganda.

You have to wonder about people who identify with conspiracy theories. Tin+foil+hat+smiley

Are you throwing mud, or flinging poop?

https://youtu.be/3V9DjE3Fan0
Hehehehe


[Image: FhVaKQ1VEAA1kV_?format=jpg&name=medium]
(10-05-2022, 01:30 PM)rothschild Wrote: [ -> ]You can't know that prior to prosecution taking place. In some instances you're right, in most instances it's speculation or assumption.

I don't know how I missed this--WTF, rothschild. You frequently refer to corruption in politics without the benefit of prosecution taking place. Holy fuck balls.
(11-12-2022, 08:45 AM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]Hehehehe


[Image: FhVaKQ1VEAA1kV_?format=jpg&name=medium]
hah
113


[Image: Fhnk1qMXkAQN0X2?format=jpg&name=medium]