Mock

Really so Mock has no standards for unsolicited pornography?

There are liberals here Duchess.

(06-07-2011, 01:42 PM)IMaDick Wrote: [ -> ]There are liberals here Duchess.

That's news to me. If they are here I've never interacted with them & I don't have one clue who they are.

(06-07-2011, 01:46 PM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-07-2011, 01:42 PM)IMaDick Wrote: [ -> ]There are liberals here Duchess.

That's news to me. If they are here I've never interacted with them & I don't have one clue who they are.

If we were at an event, and I was bartending, you'd swear I was liberal when it comes to pouring.

I'll call you a cab . . . or serve you one, too.

(06-07-2011, 01:44 PM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]

Dick, I don't borrow trouble. If or when that time comes I'll consider how it should be dealt with but to be quite honest, a photo of a penis is the very least of my concerns in regards to Mock.

You just did deal with it, it's acceptable and not a bannable offence.

I'm just a guest here, so it all good in your house.

turn the fucking page

Duchess, I'm not upset. take a look in headquarters.

(06-07-2011, 01:42 PM)IMaDick Wrote: [ -> ]Really so Mock has no standards for unsolicited pornography?

A shot of a blokes package completely covered with underwear is hardly "unsolicited pornography", either that or the underwear section of Abercrombie and Fitch is classed as porn now?

As usual this is the right blowing everything out of proportion yet again, I don't hear much condemnation of Newt Gingrich and his numerous affairs for example?

And the numerous Repubs caught with rent boys, at least they were commiting an illegal act.

Having said that you can send thousands of troops to their deaths based on lies just as long as you don't send a woman a bare chested photograph of yourself on Twitter.

Proportion?, try and get some dipshit.

(06-07-2011, 02:35 PM)IMaDick Wrote: [ -> ]Duchess, I'm not upset. take a look in headquarters.

Dick, the simple fact that you went on about it & then proceeded to ask about rules regarding it would strongly imply that yes you were upset. Are you suggesting that I go take a look at the rules, is that why you told me to check out HQ? Huh? Huh? Huh? What the fuck are you worried about penis pix for, for christssake. Jesus Dick, would you please get a grip.

Damn. Posting an unsolicited penis pic is a bannable offense?


Does this mean I can't post those pictures of me all spread eagled? What about those boobie shots I was going to put up?

(06-07-2011, 03:10 PM)username Wrote: [ -> ]Damn. Posting an unsolicited penis pic is a bannable offense?

No..but Dick wants it to be.

(06-07-2011, 03:10 PM)username Wrote: [ -> ]Does this mean I can't post those pictures of me all spread eagled? What about those boobie shots I was going to put up?

You can send those to me if you like, I will PM you my Email-address.

(06-07-2011, 03:03 PM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-07-2011, 01:42 PM)IMaDick Wrote: [ -> ]Really so Mock has no standards for unsolicited pornography?

As usual this is the right blowing everything out of proportion yet again, I don't hear much condemnation of Newt Gingrich and his numerous affairs for example?

And the numerous Repubs caught with rent boys, at least they were commiting an illegal act.

Having said that you can send thousands of troops to their deaths based on lies just as long as you don't send a woman a bare chested photograph of yourself on Twitter.

Yeah . . . Dick is the global spokesman for the right.

I now understand your position on standards, OP.

Take the lowest, vilest and despicable conduct of the opposition and use that as the benchmark or baseline for acceptable conduct for your "side".

Reminds me of siblings when they get caught misbehaving.

"Yeah, Dad, BUT HE DID THIS FIRST. You're not fair!"

Thank goodness a GOP hasn't been convicted of molesting someone's pre-teen daughter. And then a Dem doing the same thing.

Oh wait . . . she's thirteen . . . the GOP guy's girl was ten . . . that's different!

(06-07-2011, 03:14 PM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-07-2011, 03:10 PM)username Wrote: [ -> ]Does this mean I can't post those pictures of me all spread eagled? What about those boobie shots I was going to put up?

You can send those to me if you like, I will PM you my Email-address.

Well I really wanted to post them but I can see it would upset Dick's delicate sensibilities.

Or maybe it's just penis pics that freak him out (on account of those latent homosexual tendencies and all).

(06-07-2011, 03:19 PM)username Wrote: [ -> ]Well I really wanted to post them but I can see it would upset Dick's delicate sensibilities.

Or maybe it's just penis pics that freak him out (on account of those latent homosexual tendencies and all).

dicks complete aversion and lack of knowledge of the clitoris (what it is/where it is/and what to do with it) could also be an indicator of these tendencies.

don't stop now OP has just gotten into the mood for some wanking.