Mock

Full Version: Weinergate
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
(06-02-2011, 08:42 PM)Cracker Wrote: [ -> ]Dude has a respectable package. I wouldn't deny it, either. I'd be like, "Yeah, that's my dick. Suck it if you don't like it."

You made children???? There ought to be an I.Q. requirement prior to breeding for people like you.
(06-07-2011, 03:03 PM)White Pud Wrote: [ -> ]
(06-07-2011, 01:42 PM)IMaDick Wrote: [ -> ]Really so Mock has no standards for unsolicited pornography?

A shot of a blokes package completely covered with underwear is hardly "unsolicited pornography", either that or the underwear section of Abercrombie and Fitch is classed as porn now?

As usual this is the right blowing everything out of proportion yet again, I don't hear much condemnation of Newt Gingrich and his numerous affairs for example?

And the numerous Repubs caught with rent boys, at least they were commiting an illegal act.

Having said that you can send thousands of troops to their deaths based on lies just as long as you don't send a woman a bare chested photograph of yourself on Twitter.

Proportion?, try and get some dipshit.

Very well said. I might add, why would anyone be the least bit surprised that US politicians lie. We pay them to lie. I'm sure the right wing will conspiratize that he is a national security risk. His penis will bring down the democracy.

How cute OP has a groupie.

Interesting how OP points out the republican perverts and completely excuses the liberal and of course the other liberal agrees.

If anything OP is accepting of weiners behavior because it's personal.
(06-08-2011, 12:26 PM)aknow Wrote: [ -> ]I might add, why would anyone be the least bit surprised that US politicians lie. We pay them to lie.

We pay them to lie?

So . . . possible, probable or confirmed improper conduct, by either party, is to be accepted by the taxpayers and ignored by the judiciary . . .because we pay these people to lie?

And the perjury laws . . . eliminate them, too? Cops and crooks are doin' what needs to be done. Why let the truth interfere.

Next . . . pull the plug on IRS audits. C'mon . . . everybody cheats on their taxes!

Let's just eliminate the whole swearing-in charade. It doesn't really mean anything. Besides . . . it'll give our representatives more time to pursue their own needs.

I guess mediocrity is the new definition of "excellence".

Or at least one you find acceptable.

Sign_pervert

(06-08-2011, 12:20 PM)aknow Wrote: [ -> ]
(06-02-2011, 08:42 PM)Cracker Wrote: [ -> ]Dude has a respectable package. I wouldn't deny it, either. I'd be like, "Yeah, that's my dick. Suck it if you don't like it."

You made children???? There ought to be an I.Q. requirement prior to breeding for people like you.

I didn't realize Mock was a sitting committee. Next time I will phrase my comments as a justification of my hypothesis as supported by the results.

So, Mr. I-teach-my-kids-to-use-four-question-marks (Or is it Dr.?), you suggest he is better off lying? Because that was the gist of my comment.

I raised my kids with this belief:

If you will lie, you will steal
If you will steal, you will kill
Don't trust a liar.

That doesn't seem to hold much water nowadays, especially when half of our population feels that we pay our trusted representatives to lie.

Do we pay our medical professionals to lie, too? Because now would be a good time to let us all in on it.


Why don't any of these guys ever just tell journalists to mind their own business? I don't care what these guys are doing, there are way more important things going on in America than sexting even if he is in Washington. Jesus Christ.
and the search for honest representation continues.

That's the point Duchess, if he is sexting he is not doing the more important things. He is taking his position of power and using it to be a perv.



(06-08-2011, 02:16 PM)IMaDick Wrote: [ -> ]He is taking his position of power and using it to be a perv.


How is he using his position to be a perv?


(06-08-2011, 02:12 PM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]

. . . there are way more important things going on in America . . . he is in Washington

I can't think of one.

I have income. No mortgages. Have medical. Food . . . okay, I need to run to the market. Have a birth certificate. No warrants. Nothing important in my corner of America.

Except reading Mock, of course.

Shall I send him an invite between his "whatever they do in Washington" and "sexting" time?

Seems like he has some free time and America is doing fine!


Don't you get smart with me, young lady! Bend over!
Never mind Duchess ask the pud.


I knew you wouldn't have an answer.
I have an answer, you wouldn't understand it, so my advice to you is ask the one you relate the closest to, the pud.


Spit it out, Dick. I want to hear it from YOU. How is he using his position of power to be a perv?
turn the fucking page
it was bound to happen...this is alleged to be the leaked weiner photo. it's a photo of a photo that was snapped by Opie and Anthony (radio show hosts). swiped from Breitbart, who says that is accurate. he says he is pissed they stole it. hah

click to engorge..er...enlarge.
Tweet from US Congressman Anthony Weiner.

Not just from anthony Weiner, New York perv.

Duchess I think you are the only person in the country who doesn't get it. Even the liberals know that He used his influence to to be a perv, that's why Reed and Pelosi have turned on him.



He used his influence to be a perv? Bwahahaha!


Still laughing! hah
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20