Posts: 12,939
Threads: 288
Joined: Jun 2008
(04-16-2011, 02:40 PM)Ordinary Peephole Wrote: Teaching kids about gay history isn't indoctrinating them into the gay lifestyle anymore than teaching them about Adolf Hitler is indoctrinating them into the Nazi lifestyle.
You dribbling hick retard.
Adolf Hitler is real history, Gays are not.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
Posts: 15,939
Threads: 392
Joined: Jun 2008
(04-16-2011, 02:46 PM)IMaDick Wrote: Adolf Hitler is real history, Gays are not.
My cup once again runeth over with dickie dogshit.
Gays have existed throughout history therefore they are by definition "real history".
The "golden band" were Alexander the Greats (he was also a not "real history" gay) elite shock troops phalanx, they were all gays, they fought meaner and harder and nastier because they were standing toe to toe with their lover to their left.
We need to punish the French, ignore the Germans and forgive the Russians - Condoleezza Rice.
Posts: 37,639
Threads: 1,590
Joined: Jun 2008
Teaching children about the sexual inclinations of famous people is wrong. Why would children give a shit about what happens behind closed doors. You may as well say George washington chopped down a cherry tree, then went and jerked off behind the barn. Sexual preference has no place in a school curriculum. People are famous not for their sexual preference but for what they have accomplished, no wonder California is in the toilet.
Like I said, the featherheads will say "why is that wrong" well for one thing I would not want my kids learning about sex in first and second grade.
He ain't heavy, he's my brother.
Posts: 12,251
Threads: 189
Joined: Feb 2010
(04-17-2011, 10:35 AM)Maggot Wrote: Teaching children about the sexual inclinations of famous people is wrong. Why would children give a shit about what happens behind closed doors. You may as well say George washington chopped down a cherry tree, then went and jerked off behind the barn. Sexual preference has no place in a school curriculum. People are famous not for their sexual preference but for what they have accomplished, no wonder California is in the toilet.
Like I said, the featherheads will say "why is that wrong" well for one thing I would not want my kids learning about sex in first and second grade.
I agree with you. Not because I am anti-gay (lurve the gays AND Kathy Griffin, but Rosie is effen gross), but because your defining factor shouldn't be a bit of feces on your penis.
If we want true equality, we have to stop pointing out differences and base our judgments solely on accomplishment. I think MLK said something similar...
(03-15-2013, 07:12 PM)aussiefriend Wrote: You see Duchess, I have set up a thread to discuss something and this troll is behaving just like Riotgear did.
Posts: 37,639
Threads: 1,590
Joined: Jun 2008
The message MLK brought is lost on most liberals. They only use half of what he was saying.
He ain't heavy, he's my brother.
Posts: 12,251
Threads: 189
Joined: Feb 2010
We focus too much on individuals in history. MLK would have looked like a dumbass marching all by himself.
(03-15-2013, 07:12 PM)aussiefriend Wrote: You see Duchess, I have set up a thread to discuss something and this troll is behaving just like Riotgear did.
