(07-25-2010, 02:15 PM)thekid65 Wrote: Yo Dick..you neglected to answer my question...do you think, or would you have wanted Palin running this country if McCain had taken a dirt nap?

She is as capable as the elected President who is running the country now, at least she has been an elected leader of a state, obama had never been an executive before being elected.

your double standard is becoming clear, its the gender you have a problem with and you think by calling her stupid you can hide your misogynistic tendencies.

(07-25-2010, 04:43 PM)Duchess Wrote:

What if everything is gone because it's all been so mismanaged. I'll be old & alone, on the streets pushing a cart with all my possessions, my old beloved horse pulling up the rear.

You have a better chance of this happening under the current administration.

The only difference being that they will take your horse for your back taxes, and medical care for someone else you don't even know.

(07-25-2010, 06:50 PM)IMaDick Wrote: your double standard is becoming clear, its the gender you have a problem with and you think by calling her stupid you can hide your misogynistic tendencies.

Absolutely not, as a matter of fact, as previously stated, I think Hillary might make a decent prez, although I didnt think as much during the primary. She's done a stand-up job as S.O.S., imo...and gaining valuable foreign policy experience. The one thing that gives me reservations is that she didnt have the balls to kick her cheating husband out of the house.

Palin, on the other hand, is just plain fucking stupid. Albeit, she has turned her experience into quite the cash cow with speaking engagements, and TV shows.....give her credit for that, I suppose.

(07-25-2010, 03:36 PM)God Wrote: And if you're so fucking great, why aren't you there?

I'd never pass the piss test.

Run, Sarah, run! It would show that the Right has lost its collective mind (was there ANY doubt?).

If Sarah Palin does run it maybe be the funniest political election campaign in world history.

Sarah Palin is the lefts deflection they say " Hey look at what the right has to offer hahaha" It makes Obama look good. It kinda sucks that Romney will probably win.

(05-07-2011, 06:58 PM)Maggot Wrote: Sarah Palin is the lefts deflection they say " Hey look at what the right has to offer hahaha" It makes Obama look good. It kinda sucks that Romney will probably win.

More potential candidates coming forward. Jon Huntsman and Bobby Jindal. I don't know enough about either of them to comment yet but Bobby offered up his birth certificate today.

Ya think? I hated seeing Palin on the ticket, she was only there because of Hillary, trying to get the female vote. If Hillary ran today she would win. I truly believe that. I have changed my mind with her. We need a true bitch in office now and her foreign affairs stature is better than Barrys. She should run as an independant with Ron Paul as vice. Screw party lines.

So maggot, you're ready to give up your guns? that would be hillarys claim to fame as President it is one of her goals to have weapons banned in the US.

http://www.issues2000.org/Gun_Control.htm

(05-07-2011, 07:40 PM)Maggot Wrote: Ya think? I hated seeing Palin on the ticket, she was only there because of Hillary, trying to get the female vote. If Hillary ran today she would win. I truly believe that. I have changed my mind with her. We need a true bitch in office now and her foreign affairs stature is better than Barrys. She should run as an independant with Ron Paul as vice. Screw party lines.

I voted for Hilary in the primaries. I'd love to vote outside of party lines this next election. I'm not happy with either the far right or far left.

I have a lot of studying to do when all the Republican contenders finally step forward. I remember Ron Paul running but I still don't know much about him. I was just reading about him on wikipedia...I'm not going to judge him for a few stupid remarks (every candidate has made them) but these are some pretty big if they're true:

Controversial claims made in Ron Paul's newsletters, written in the first person narrative, included statements such as "Boy, it sure burns me to have a national holiday for that pro-communist philanderer Martin Luther King. I voted against this outrage time and time again as a Congressman. What an infamy that Ronald Reagan approved it! We can thank him for our annual Hate Whitey Day." [134] Another notable statement that garnered controversy was "opinion polls consistently show only about 5% of blacks have sensible political opinions, if you have ever been robbed by a black teen-aged male, you know how unbelievably fleet-footed they can be".[135] An issue from 1992 refers to carjacking as the "hip-hop thing to do among the urban youth who play unsuspecting whites like pianos."[136] In an article titled "The Pink House" the newsletter wrote that "Homosexuals, not to speak of the rest of society, were far better off when social pressure forced them to hide their activities."

I read a little further; he blamed it on ghostwriters:

Paul had given his own account of the newsletters in March 2001, stating the documents were authored by ghostwriters, and that while he did not author the challenged passages, he bore "some moral responsibility" for their publication.

How like would you be to vote for a relative unknown?

one that has limited funds,"not a billion dollars" poised to buy the election.

sorry folks this country is already below the belt line, it is unlikely anyone who is not a big name contender will stand a chance, even though that may be just exactly what we need.

Eh, we're screwed either way. We have massive debt that needs to be paid. As much as people are trying to ignore that fact, it is true.

I'm voting for this guy. Then nobody can bitch and we can all focus to getting out of this hole.



Debt is bad. You are never free if you are indebted to someone else.

Fuck that, I would vote for opie before I voted for that foreigner shit head.

you know this country is ready for a president who could do a playboy centerfold.

Palin for pres in 2012.

(05-07-2011, 08:50 PM)IMaDick Wrote: How like would you be to vote for a relative unknown?

one that has limited funds,"not a billion dollars" poised to buy the election.

sorry folks this country is already below the belt line, it is unlikely anyone who is not a big name contender will stand a chance, even though that may be just exactly what we need.

I've said it before, we're basically a two party dictatorship. I think the vast majority of us would vote for some middle party candidate but there's no money there and consequently no truly viable candidates there. I don't think that will change unless and until we address campaign funding.

You know on both sides of politics there is still the "ruling class". Both sides have dynasties and families that are connected. Not much has changed since the olden days. Just presented differently.

(05-08-2011, 12:15 AM)IMaDick Wrote: Palin for pres in 2012.

(05-07-2011, 07:50 PM)IMaDick Wrote: So maggot, you're ready to give up your guns? that would be hillarys claim to fame as President it is one of her goals to have weapons banned in the US.

http://www.issues2000.org/Gun_Control.htm

"Take my home and my pension but don't take my guns!"

(05-08-2011, 12:15 AM)IMaDick Wrote: Fuck that, I would vote for opie before I voted for that foreigner shit head.

dick is too fucking dense to realise that photo is an amalgamation of the faces of Obama and George W Bush!