(07-16-2021, 08:10 PM)MirahM Wrote: Duh, because they were on the side of the insurrectionists. They allowed it to happen. Or maybe they didn't know they would storm the capital. Oh but wait-those were democrats dressed as republicans who broke shit and killed someone. I forgot. And even then it wasn't real. It was fake. All fake news.

Were those protestors advised that they were violating federal law and would be subject to prosecution? Why weren't National Guard units there to prevent things from getting out of control?

(07-16-2021, 08:24 PM)rothschild Wrote:

(07-16-2021, 08:10 PM)MirahM Wrote: Duh, because they were on the side of the insurrectionists. They allowed it to happen. Or maybe they didn't know they would storm the capital. Oh but wait-those were democrats dressed as republicans who broke shit and killed someone. I forgot. And even then it wasn't real. It was fake. All fake news.

Were those protestors advised that they were violating federal law and would be subject to prosecution? Why weren't National Guard units there to prevent things from getting out of control?

Three words. Because of Trump.

BECAUSE THEY WERE WHITE!!!!!

(07-17-2021, 12:21 AM)MirahM Wrote: BECAUSE THEY WERE WHITE!!!!!

By that "logic" there must not be any whites in prison. And not a single white person has ever been executed in America. And all those downwinders that were poisoned by nuclear testing in Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah, they were all black people, right? And why do you assume that Trump was the only one that had any say re Capitol security? Do you think Pelosi and Schumer were gun-shy because they didn't want anything to happen to those precious, white Trumpers?

"Why weren't the National Guard units there to prevent things from getting out of control?"

That is the question you asked RC.

Of course white people are arrested. Look at Epstein.

Why were National Guard called on the black protestors countless times and not on January 6^th?

Oh wait-because no one fears the white protestor. Especially if they have a name like "Ammon Bundy"

(07-17-2021, 01:21 AM)MirahM Wrote: "Why weren't the National Guard units there to prevent things from getting out of control?"

That is the question you asked RC.

Of course white people are arrested. Look at Epstein.

Look at how the Branch Davidian hostage situation was dealt with. Brutal, murderous violence -- against whites, Mirah. Better still, look at the entirety of human history, in which suffering and deprivation was the overwhelming norm for almost everyone. During slavery a great many whites suffered to an almost equal extent, toiling in wretched, deplorable conditions for a meagre pittance. But you don't seem to understand this basic fact, and I wonder why that is.

(07-17-2021, 01:23 AM)MirahM Wrote: Why were National Guard called on the black protestors countless times and not on January 6^th?

Oh wait-because no one fears the white protestor. Especially if they have a name like "Ammon Bundy"

They weren't just blacks, Mirah. A great many of them were white, actually.

Oh, well thats good. Definitely equal treatment then.

No worries! Move on!

(07-17-2021, 09:34 AM)MirahM Wrote: Oh, well thats good. Definitely equal treatment then.

No worries! Move on!

When you can't distinguish elite supremacy from white supremacy, what's the likelihood that you'll be part of a real solution? Do you even care enough to find out if you've invested in an ideology that seeks real social justice, as opposed to marxist claptrap that amounts to pouring gasoline on society and then cheering as everything goes up in flames?

Oh yeah I would definitely cheer as stuff goes up in flames. You've definitely nailed me. You are so good. I knew you would figure it out.

(07-17-2021, 02:15 PM)MirahM Wrote: Oh yeah I would definitely cheer as stuff goes up in flames. You've definitely nailed me. You are so good. I knew you would figure it out.

I'm asking you, but I guess you're too offended to think coherently, which seems to be your MO. So get back to me if you ever decide you would like to discuss this rationally.

(07-17-2021, 02:42 PM)rothschild Wrote:

(07-17-2021, 02:15 PM)MirahM Wrote: Oh yeah I would definitely cheer as stuff goes up in flames. You've definitely nailed me. You are so good. I knew you would figure it out.

I'm asking you, but I guess you're too offended to think coherently, which seems to be your MO. So get back to me if you ever decide you would like to discuss this rationally.

Just as as soon as you find a rational man by proxy.

(07-17-2021, 07:53 PM)Clang McFly Wrote:

(07-17-2021, 02:42 PM)rothschild Wrote:

(07-17-2021, 02:15 PM)MirahM Wrote: Oh yeah I would definitely cheer as stuff goes up in flames. You've definitely nailed me. You are so good. I knew you would figure it out.

I'm asking you, but I guess you're too offended to think coherently, which seems to be your MO. So get back to me if you ever decide you would like to discuss this rationally.

Just as as soon as you find a rational man by proxy.

Your grammar is almost as bad as your reasoning.

He's a 300 lb man who thinks he looks good as a woman, you want him to pay attention to grammar now? Or anything rational for that matter?

(07-17-2021, 09:39 PM)sally Wrote: He's a 300 lb man who thinks he looks good as a woman, you want him to pay attention to grammar now? Or anything rational for that matter?

I didn't pay attention to grammar and she died.

Do you mean you are putting your feminine side to rest? Thank christ already. You weren't meant to be a woman, Clang. You're no Rachel lavine.

(07-17-2021, 10:53 PM)sally Wrote: Do you mean you are putting your feminine side to rest? Thank christ already. You weren't meant to be a woman, Clang. You're no Rachel lavine.

No, I'm going to dive deeper into my feminine side. Thanks for not caring about my dead grandma though.

(07-17-2021, 02:42 PM)rothschild Wrote:

(07-17-2021, 02:15 PM)MirahM Wrote: Oh yeah I would definitely cheer as stuff goes up in flames. You've definitely nailed me. You are so good. I knew you would figure it out.

I'm asking you, but I guess you're too offended to think coherently, which seems to be your MO. So get back to me if you ever decide you would like to discuss this rationally.

You asked me if I cared.
You told me I couldn't distinguish supremecy.
You asked what the liklihood was that I would be part of a "REAL" solution
You suggested I might be interested in a marxist claptrap idealogy that pours gasoline over society and then claps when everything burns.

I'm not offended. I just think you don't know me very well and are being a little judgy in those statements. Conversation? You want to discuss something rationally. Interesting. I didn't see that in your statements.

(07-18-2021, 12:46 AM)MirahM Wrote:

(07-17-2021, 02:42 PM)rothschild Wrote:

(07-17-2021, 02:15 PM)MirahM Wrote: Oh yeah I would definitely cheer as stuff goes up in flames. You've definitely nailed me. You are so good. I knew you would figure it out.

I'm asking you, but I guess you're too offended to think coherently, which seems to be your MO. So get back to me if you ever decide you would like to discuss this rationally.

You asked me if I cared.
You told me I couldn't distinguish supremecy.
You asked what the liklihood was that I would be part of a "REAL" solution
You suggested I might be interested in a marxist claptrap idealogy that pours gasoline over society and then claps when everything burns.

I'm not offended. I just think you don't know me very well and are being a little judgy in those statements. Conversation? You want to discuss something rationally. Interesting. I didn't see that in your statements.

South Africa is going up in Flames. Haiti just had another coup. Cuba is teetering on the brink. And the Western World isn't terribly far behind. BLM openly acknowledges that it's aligned with marxist ideology, and I've never seen you say anything that suggests you see elitism as being problematic with respect to the extreme economic disparity causing chaos all over the world. If you'd like to fill me in on what I'm missing, I'm all ears.