Hello

[Fry Guy]

Really? That is interesting. I do not feel offended. Tell me more about my offence. I want to understand my offence more.

[MirahM]

You still bring up something you think she accused someone of.
Did she not do it creatively enough
on a Mock forum?
Now I could follow you around and remind you in several posts how you told me to take a bath and put my blow dryer in it.

[Fry Guy]

You can if you like. I certainly will encourage you to.
As for me keeping on bringing up something I will stop holding her feet to the fire over something she ought to have ever said and as to my signature, that is set and forget. Hell my signature about Sally stayed there for years. The signature is ALSO HoTD's ACTUAL words. This is not me being creative.

[BigMark]

Lets see those honey dew melons!

[HairOfTheDog]

I don't give a shit about FryGuy or his signature line, and I really hope nobody else here lets it bother them anymore either.

I know that nobody at Mock needs FryGuy to warn them about me or other members, or to position members as victims of me or other members, or to litigate heated exchanges between members (especially those who've been debating each other on the same topics here for years). We're all quite capable of forming our own opinions and speaking for ourselves.

Anyway, FryGuy obviously feels the need or desire to do those things and put his creepy obsession with me on full display in every single post he's ever made at Mock. It speaks to who he is and he's entitled to express himself however he likes in his sig line, same as everyone else.

I don't have a problem ignoring it and don't think it deserves any more attention or airtime. It's boring shit, to me.

[Clang McFly]

I can't even see TrytoohardGuy's signature line(or anyone else's) in mobile mode. Sounds like it's a good thing

[Fry Guy]

I don't give a shit about FryGuy or his signature line, and I really hope nobody else here lets it bother them anymore either.

I know that nobody at Mock needs FryGuy to warn them about me or other members, or to position members as victims of me or other members, or to litigate heated exchanges between members (especially those who've been debating each other on the same topics here for years). We're all quite capable of forming our own opinions and speaking for ourselves.

Anyway, FryGuy obviously feels the need or desire to do those things and put his creepy obsession with me on full display in every single post he's ever made at Mock. It speaks to who he is and he's entitled to express himself however he likes in his sig line, same as everyone else.

I don't have a problem ignoring it and don't think it deserves any more attention or airtime. It's boring shit, to me.

One of the defining features of the Snowflake mentality is to pathologise people that do not agree with you or share your point of view.
I disagree with you and call you out on your bullshit, and so that now translates to me having a creepy obsession about a pink wigged dog avatar. That makes no fucking sense and I am sure if you tried really hard you could not make the substantial logical leaps to bridge that narrative.
You are far from the only person I have disagreed with or will continue to disagree with.

So why ARE you dishonest? Well, in the same way that when you got triggered by Maggot, to win the argument and shut down Maggot you pathologised him. PROOF of that is captured for posterity in the quote below that YOU wrote. Your actual words.

Words made to shame someone with a pathology of the worst of degenerates so that he would be dehumanised and you would get the benefit of degrading his character and thus his argument and you could both shut him down and signal your virtue. I sawe through it in a second.

You are trying it on here too trying to pathologise my comments to and about you. No going to work. For the record too, you are not a victim and your replying is not indifference. Don't piss on the membership's heads and tell them it is raining.

[sally]

I really dont think that HotD believes that Maggot is a rapist - child molester apologist. If she did, she wouldn't be talking to him. I don't care what she said, this is a place where you can say whatever the fuck you want, I say all kinds of crazy shit and never have to explain myself, if you want to analyze the shit then you should know that no one gives a fuck other than you.

[Fry Guy]

I really dont think that HotD believes that Maggot is a rapist - child molester apologist. If she did, she wouldn't be talking to him. I don't care what she said, this is a place where you can say whatever the fuck you want, I say all kinds of crazy shit and never have to explain myself, if you want to analyze the shit then you should know that no one gives a fuck other than you.

That is fine with me too. I don't think she thinks that either. I think it is something Snowflakes are prepared to do to try to win arguments.

[sally]

And whats wrong with that? I'll make up some huge ass lies to win an argument. By the way, I wish you'd stop pming me about Hotd.

[Fry Guy]

It is the victimisation that goes with it and/or the moral superiority that goes with it.

You'd have done better spelling out the PM about HoTD.

"FryGuy that shit about HoTD that you PM'ed me is really childish and sexist. You are really dishonest in what you said and I don't know who you are trying to convince. By the way I don't like your pet name to me, its gross".

Now that would be more in line with the kind of thing that annoys me. Not a huge amount but yeah, it does.

Ticks the boxes:

Unfalsifiable
Paints you as a victim and a marginalised oppressed one at that
Dehumanises
Breaks confidence
Promotes yourself and/or others as not being right or wrong but morally superior.

It is the Snowflake mentality.

Mind you, what annoys me or I find abhorrent does not change my life in any meaningful way but if we must interact and communicate on a forum then I think we ought to respond to what is there rather than ignore what is there. Work with what we have.

[HairOfTheDog]

I really dont think that HotD believes that Maggot is a  rapist - child molester apologist. If she did, she wouldn't be talking to him. I don't care what she said, this is a place where you can say whatever the fuck you want, I say all kinds of crazy shit and never have to explain myself, if you want to analyze the shit then you should know that no one gives a fuck other than you.

I addressed the partial quote in FryGuy's sig line directly with Maggot at the time, and I already clearly explained to FryGuy (http://mockforums.net/thread-13578.html) that I don't consider Maggot a rapist, a child molester, or anything of the sort when he first started harping on it.  

If Maggot or anyone else feels they need an internet white knight because they consider themselves scarred and victimized by me, I'd be surprised.  Nobody else comes across as so easily traumatized and obsessive as FryGuy.

But, if so, they're free to take it up with me directly; or join FryGuy's crusade, call me a 'lying slimeball SJW' til their hearts' content, and bitch and complain forevermore.

[HairOfTheDog]

I am new here and thought I would just see what this forum is like and if it is right for me.

So, Fisherman, how are you liking it here so far?  

[Fry Guy]

I really dont think that HotD believes that Maggot is a  rapist - child molester apologist. If she did, she wouldn't be talking to him. I don't care what she said, this is a place where you can say whatever the fuck you want, I say all kinds of crazy shit and never have to explain myself, if you want to analyze the shit then you should know that no one gives a fuck other than you.

I addressed the partial quote in FryGuy's sig line directly with Maggot at the time, and I already clearly explained to FryGuy (http://mockforums.net/thread-13578.html) that I don't consider Maggot a rapist, a child molester, or anything of the sort when he first started harping on it.  

If Maggot or anyone else feels they need an internet white knight because they consider themselves scarred and victimized by me, I'd be surprised.  Nobody else comes across as so easily traumatized and obsessive as FryGuy.

But, if so, they're free to take it up with me directly; or join FryGuy's crusade, call me a 'lying slimeball SJW' til their hearts' content, and bitch and complain forevermore.

Again, you aren't a victim, you are not being victimised and pretending so is dishonest.

I am neither on a crusade nor traumatised nor obsessive. Saying so does not make it so. But knock yourself out with your propaganda.

You may have "addressed" anything or nothing at all. In truth, it looks to me you deliberately misinterpreted something someone that disagreed with you and in a want to portray yourself as having a morally superior position and dehumanised and shamed your opponent in an effort to crush his narrative.
It was gross and NOT a mistake or misreading. You knew what he was saying because a) to read as you were trying to say you were was NOT a linear reading of it and b) you HAD to presume a level of immorality that you do not believe of Maggot and would be hard pressed believing of anyone of your association.

I do not for a moment think that you misunderstood Maggot. You just wanted to (for whatever outraged sensibilities) smear and shut him up. Then I inconvenienced you by pointing out rather easily the natural and more easily understood reading of what he said and then you backed away from your suggestions one of our moderator peers was a rape apologist and child abuse supporter.

Your bad. Whoops. "Forget the suggestions that you are the among the most amoral percentage of the population, slightly misunderstood something you said, all good, I am calmed down, I was just thinking of the poor children and wanted to let everyone know".

So all good? Sure all good. Sig stays. Stop pretending to be a victim and stop being a snowflake.

[Rootilda]

TryTooHardGuy wouldn't pester you like a lovestruck 10 year old if you weren't good looking and intelligent. He'd dip your pigtails in the inkwell if he could. (Y'all might have to google that reference, it was old when I was a kid.)

[Fry Guy]

Indeed a dog with pink hair is really considered good looking to some. Myself, not so much, but I do not judge you for making such an argument.

[Duchess]

I take it you haven't looked through MEMBER'S PHOTO GALLERY in the private forum. If you had you would understand why Rootilda said that.

[Fry Guy]

Nope. I haven't.
Is she eye candy? If she IS eye candy, would that somehow have to dictate how I interact with her? I am not understanding Rootilda's premise. I am sure Rootilda has one and I have no doubt it just escapes me.

[Duchess]

Of course that shouldn't dictate how you interact with her. What the hell is wrong with you. Are you always so crochety? Jeez Louise.

[Fry Guy]

You are right. I am being grumpy. I have work. It's Monday morning and I have 8-9 hours of having to sort out problems for people a d be nice all day.

BUT

That is not your issue and it is not actually THAT bad. Most of them are fine. Some are regulars and really like me.
I know i am good at my job, my work mates like me, the management really like me and I got an award at the end of year function on Friday night.

Hardly all doom and gloom.

I just am grumpy and cantankerous by nature. Ironically not angry or depressed. Just an old man.