Login

**Cynical Ninja** · 05-26-2009, 10:29 AM

Yes MF, pussy ass that he is, has changed the rules at the political forum because bullet/rooster posted a little diatribe towards me and MF is too pussy ass to censor him.

You are no allowed to name call etc in the political forum at 24.

Lumpypussy should be let back in a think, I believe her crime was something she posted in the political forum, well that crime would technically no longer be a crime.

**Duchess** · 05-26-2009, 11:48 AM

That's some kinda joke, right ?...You can't possibly believe that MF would be frightened of some obscure, middle aged ex-con who lives hundreds of miles away...That would be like me worrying that Ramsey was gonna come & trounce my ass...Take it for what it is, simply a man fed up with having to babysit adults...Fuck all if I would want to have to watch over people that should know better but, don't...Why do you even do this to yourself, OP ?...They all KNOW what it takes to send you into a frenzy & you fall for their bs time after time...I wouldn't give those fanatical motherfuckers the satisfaction of knowing they got to me.

**Middle Finger** · 05-26-2009, 01:14 PM

Ordinary Peephole Wrote:Yes MF, pussy ass that he is, has changed the rules at the political forum because bullet/rooster posted a little diatribe towards me and MF is too pussy ass to censor him.

Quite the opposite. I had been thinking of doing it last week after I let you back in and Mill, Mud, and you went at it. The Rooster thing was just the last straw after a long holiday weekend away from the computer. I changed the rules so that I no longer have to protect hypocrites (I used that term in my response toward him at 24 in the thread you are referencing) that claim to find respect of the rules important, or those that house "conservative values" that are supposed to value things like discipline and respect.

You claiming I am afraid to censor a Biker when I have done so and banned Bikers before is just you either playing stupid or being ignorant.

I am also done babysitting that much in that forum, like I've said. It's just the next evolutionary phase in me not spending time on-line doing things I do not want to do.

One of the very nice things about Mock is that I don't get bothered that much here and can actually enjoy myself. I don't have to babysit adults.

**Duchess** · 05-26-2009, 01:38 PM

Middle Finger Wrote:One of the very nice things about Mock is that I don't get bothered that much here and can actually enjoy myself. I don't have to babysit adults.

This was my favorite part...Sorta/kinda like another trophy of sorts to add to what is our growing collection...I don't care if every last one of you think my competitiveness with that other place is juvenile...vote for his post, bitches..I want Mock to have another trophy.

05-26-2009, 06:32 PM

It's not true though, just ask Fox. Unlike us, she's high class and intelligent... she says so repeatedly, hoping someone might actually believe her.

**Luke Warmwater** · 05-26-2009, 09:47 PM

Perhaps, but she's still a cunt.

**Duchess** · 05-27-2009, 05:09 AM

LuMPyPussy Wrote:she's high class and intelligent.

High class ?...Hahahaha...I beg to differ...I know high class & that old cow doesn't possess an ounce of it...Intelligence ?...How the hell could someone tell if she has any at all ?...I've only ever seen her discuss one thing, ad nauseam.

**Cynical Ninja** · 05-27-2009, 06:21 AM

Middle Finger Wrote:
Ordinary Peephole Wrote:Yes MF, pussy ass that he is, has changed the rules at the political forum because bullet/rooster posted a little diatribe towards me and MF is too pussy ass to censor him.

Quite the opposite. I had been thinking of doing it last week after I let you back in and Mill, Mud, and you went at it. The Rooster thing was just the last straw after a long holiday weekend away from the computer. I changed the rules so that I no longer have to protect hypocrites (I used that term in my response toward him at 24 in the thread you are referencing) that claim to find respect of the rules important, or those that house "conservative values" that are supposed to value things like discipline and respect.

You claiming I am afraid to censor a Biker when I have done so and banned Bikers before is just you either playing stupid or being ignorant.

I am also done babysitting that much in that forum, like I've said. It's just the next evolutionary phase in me not spending time on-line doing things I do not want to do.

One of the very nice things about Mock is that I don't get bothered that much here and can actually enjoy myself. I don't have to babysit adults.

Bull-shit.

He posted at 7.24 PM and you suddenly changed the rules at 7.30 PM, a direct response, had it been anybody else disciplinary action would have been taken, I know it, you know it, Rooster knows it.

You can try and convince yourself that the timing was mere coincidence or that Roosters post was the straw that broke the camels back but we both know the real truth don't we?

05-27-2009, 07:32 AM

More likely he's afraid of "Smooth".

Edited to add:

Damn, he's right. MF wrote his rule change six minutes after Bullet posted his curse-laden tirade against OP. ::laugh::

**Duchess** · 05-27-2009, 07:37 AM

::gigg::

05-27-2009, 07:38 AM

Just want to note that Duchess' reaction was to my post BEFORE I edited it.

**Cynical Ninja** · 05-27-2009, 07:45 AM

LuMPyPussy Wrote:More likely he's afraid of "Smooth".

Edited to add:

Damn, he's right. MF wrote his rule change six minutes after Bullet posted his curse-laden tirade against OP. ::laugh::

Of course I'm right, I can read MF like a book.

A really shit book with crap characters, a lame narrative and a plot twist that makes no sense.

**Middle Finger** · 05-27-2009, 08:18 AM

Dear Retard,

Yes, like I said, when I came across Rooster's post I decided to not even read what was before it and just make the rule change I had been thinking about. I had no desire to examine the drama in that thread as I am done babysitting like that.

Read my previous post again. If you want to keep thinking I was "afraid" to send Rooster a warning, have a blast.

**Cynical Ninja** · 05-27-2009, 08:53 AM

If I had posted what Rooster had posted the rules would not have been changed, I would have been banned, correct?

**Middle Finger** · 05-27-2009, 08:54 AM

Ordinary Peephole Wrote:If I had posted what Rooster had posted the rules would not have been changed, I would have been banned, correct?

I would have treated him the way I treated you the first time you broke the rules in that fashion - send you a warning. You know, those little things you have a collection of? That was his first offense. I've sent Bikers warnings and have removed their access before, but don't let that change your retardation.

**Cynical Ninja** · 05-27-2009, 02:21 PM

But you didn't have the nutsack to give him a warning so you changed the forum rules instead youpussy asspillow humper.

**Middle Finger** · 05-27-2009, 02:39 PM

Ordinary Peephole Wrote:But you didn't have the nutsack to give him a warning so you changed the forum rules instead youpussy asspillow humper.

Right, I changed the rules for the Politics forum because I was afraid to send a warning. Got it.

I can't believe someone married you. She must be one screwed up bitch.

**Luke Warmwater** · 05-28-2009, 02:32 AM

Yup, it's been very quiet over there since the rule change.

muddflap is like a retarded child without his mommy when millivanilli isn't around...jesus, what a pathetic turd. The place should liven up as soon as milli gets done 'night recycling' the flags from the graves to sell in his old lady's shoppe

05-28-2009, 06:41 AM

You wanna know what's ironic? For all their foot stomping and whining how the rules are turning the place into Mock Lite, both Mudd and "Smooth" got POTD for insulting me yesterday.

Fucking hypocrites. I need to stay away from there, it just pisses me off.

**Cynical Ninja** · 05-28-2009, 08:04 AM

The fox klux klan always vote for each other I wouldn't take it personally.

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me