Posts: 29,189
Threads: 391
Joined: Aug 2011
(05-19-2012, 12:59 AM)IMaDick Wrote: Van jones en-cited the people he was speaking to using fear as a substantive motivation to act.
Terrorism at it's core essential is fear.
eco terrorism does not require violence only the embodiment of fear.
I get that, Dick. In fact, most eco-terrorism involves threats and not actual violence.
I feel like we're running in circles here. How does Van Jones' use of eco-terrorism relate to Obama or liberals being advocates for it, as you initially implied? I realize he once worked for Obama for a short time. Are you saying that makes the Democrats or Liberals advocates for eco-terrorism?
Posts: 12,939
Threads: 288
Joined: Jun 2008
(05-19-2012, 01:03 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: (05-19-2012, 12:59 AM)IMaDick Wrote: Van jones en-cited the people he was speaking to using fear as a substantive motivation to act.
Terrorism at it's core essential is fear.
eco terrorism does not require violence only the embodiment of fear.
I get that, Dick. In fact, most eco-terrorism involves threats and not actual violence.
I feel like we're running in circles here. How does Van Jones' use of eco-terrorism relate to Obama or liberals being advocates for it, as you initially implied? I realize he once worked for Obama for a short time. Are you saying that makes the Democrats or Liberals advocates for eco-terrorism?
Did you miss Solyndra? did you miss the denial of the oil pipeline? did you miss the EPA and it's expanded powers?
at some point The administrations position and the administrations rules and regulations need to be viewed in context.
What position did van jones hold again, please remind me?
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
Posts: 29,189
Threads: 391
Joined: Aug 2011
(05-19-2012, 01:08 AM)IMaDick Wrote: (05-19-2012, 01:03 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: (05-19-2012, 12:59 AM)IMaDick Wrote: Van jones en-cited the people he was speaking to using fear as a substantive motivation to act.
Terrorism at it's core essential is fear.
eco terrorism does not require violence only the embodiment of fear.
I get that, Dick. In fact, most eco-terrorism involves threats and not actual violence.
I feel like we're running in circles here. How does Van Jones' use of eco-terrorism relate to Obama or liberals being advocates for it, as you initially implied? I realize he once worked for Obama for a short time. Are you saying that makes the Democrats or Liberals advocates for eco-terrorism?
Did you miss Solyndra? did you miss the denial of the oil pipeline? did you miss the EPA and it's expanded powers?
at some point The administrations position and the administrations rules and regulations need to be viewed in context.
What position did van jones hold again, please remind me?
You know I love you, Dick. And, you're my favorite person to debate with here because I find that you generally do have your facts straight, though your interpretations of how they fit into an argument often differ from mine. You don't claim to hold a position just because it seems cool or conforms. I glean insight from the exchanges and it's never personal.
In this case, I feel like you've made me do a bunch of homework and told me to connect dots and now you're asking me for one guy's position on adminstrative rules and regulations. Can I give it you? Sure. I can look it up. I say AGAIN, I was only taking you up on your offer to give your opinions/proof of what you asserted in a post because I was interested. No more homework for HOTD - it's the weekend for FFS. I don't care anymore.
Now, I just wish I was tossin' back a Maker's Mark around your fire pit and singing while you play guitar. Okay?
Posts: 12,939
Threads: 288
Joined: Jun 2008
Do you want to move on to Eric holder? He's is the holder of the race war.
I still think you're playing stupid and as long as you do I will treat you like you are.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
Posts: 29,189
Threads: 391
Joined: Aug 2011
(05-19-2012, 01:49 AM)IMaDick Wrote: Do you want to move on to Eric holder? He's is the holder of the race war.
I still think you're playing stupid and as long as you do I will treat you like you are.
Okay, I no longer love you as a poster (shit, I still do, but reluctantly, you asshole). Stupid is not a word that's ever been used to characterize me, whether it be playing or for real. I don't do stupid, but certainly I'm ignorant about some things and that's why I ask questions. You wanna take back the "stupid" characterization, Dick? Then, we can talk about Mr. Holder?
Posts: 3,557
Threads: 127
Joined: Apr 2012
I remember when someone else called you stupid.
Pretty stupid of them, also.
Posts: 12,939
Threads: 288
Joined: Jun 2008
Playing stupid and being stupid are 2 different things.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
Posts: 29,189
Threads: 391
Joined: Aug 2011
(05-19-2012, 08:20 AM)IMaDick Wrote: Playing stupid and being stupid are 2 different things.
Yes, I know. I'm not doing either. I just can't read your mind, Dick. But, I can read the news, so I'll just do that for an independent conservative slant on the issues you mentioned. 
Posts: 12,939
Threads: 288
Joined: Jun 2008
(05-19-2012, 09:30 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: (05-19-2012, 08:20 AM)IMaDick Wrote: Playing stupid and being stupid are 2 different things.
Yes, I know. I'm not doing either. I just can't read your mind, Dick. But, I can read the news, so I'll just do that for an independent conservative slant on the issues you mentioned.
Yeah, the news, that should tie up all of the loose ends.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
Posts: 12,939
Threads: 288
Joined: Jun 2008
(05-19-2012, 09:30 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: (05-19-2012, 08:20 AM)IMaDick Wrote: Playing stupid and being stupid are 2 different things.
Yes, I know. I'm not doing either. I just can't read your mind, Dick. But, I can read the news, so I'll just do that for an independent conservative slant on the issues you mentioned.
Yeah, the news, that should tie up all of the loose ends.
http://www.infowars.com/judge-blocks-portion-of-ndaa/
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
Posts: 15,939
Threads: 392
Joined: Jun 2008
(05-19-2012, 09:48 AM)IMaDick Wrote: Yeah, the news, that should tie up all of the loose ends.
http://www.infowars.com/judge-blocks-portion-of-ndaa/
 Oh yes!, that bastion of ethical journalism Infowars and prisonplanet!
Brought by Alex "New world order" Jones.
When you are using links to that idiots sites you really have well and truly lost the debate.
We need to punish the French, ignore the Germans and forgive the Russians - Condoleezza Rice.
Posts: 12,939
Threads: 288
Joined: Jun 2008
(05-19-2012, 10:00 AM)Cynical Ninja Wrote: (05-19-2012, 09:48 AM)IMaDick Wrote: Yeah, the news, that should tie up all of the loose ends.
http://www.infowars.com/judge-blocks-portion-of-ndaa/
Oh yes!, that bastion of ethical journalism Infowars and prisonplanet!
Brought by Alex "New world order" Jones.
When you are using links to that idiots sites you really have well and truly lost the debate.
I wasn't having a debate, HotD was , that was the reason for the problem she was having connecting the dots.
The article is factual.
You haven't got a clue what you're talking about.
You are still a nutfuck.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
Posts: 15,939
Threads: 392
Joined: Jun 2008
We need to punish the French, ignore the Germans and forgive the Russians - Condoleezza Rice.
Posts: 86,987
Threads: 2,951
Joined: Jun 2008
I'm still surprised when I see people admit to tuning into a news source that is an international joke.
Posts: 12,251
Threads: 189
Joined: Feb 2010
I am still amazed people think one news source is any different than another. Media is media. When I see "Faux News" I automatically ignore anything that comes next. Like one view is any more relevant than any other.
Fox News breaks some stories other news outlets won't touch. Then the others have to take it and add their spin. Why is that better?
ACORN mutherfuckers.
(03-15-2013, 07:12 PM)aussiefriend Wrote: You see Duchess, I have set up a thread to discuss something and this troll is behaving just like Riotgear did.
Posts: 86,987
Threads: 2,951
Joined: Jun 2008
(05-19-2012, 10:24 AM)Cracker Wrote: I am still amazed people think one news source is any different than another. Media is media.
No, Cracker, media is not media & you're smart enough to know better. Jesus Christ.
Posts: 12,939
Threads: 288
Joined: Jun 2008
(05-19-2012, 10:27 AM)Duchess Wrote: (05-19-2012, 10:24 AM)Cracker Wrote: I am still amazed people think one news source is any different than another. Media is media.
No, Cracker, media is not media & you're smart enough to know better. Jesus Christ.
So you think that the Federal judge did not block part of that law?
Interesting.
You think that I can't post the same info from several different news sources?
Interesting.
To look at the source and discount the info is ignorant.
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
Posts: 12,939
Threads: 288
Joined: Jun 2008
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
Posts: 12,251
Threads: 189
Joined: Feb 2010
(05-19-2012, 10:27 AM)Duchess Wrote: (05-19-2012, 10:24 AM)Cracker Wrote: I am still amazed people think one news source is any different than another. Media is media.
No, Cracker, media is not media & you're smart enough to know better. Jesus Christ.
Yes, it is. It is all opinion. Very few media sources just print facts without inserting their own subjectivity into it.
People here are confusing the editorial portions of different news sites with the actual reporting. They are two different things.
Thinking any news source is unbiased is a fallacy. News sources market themselves to certain audiences because they are in it for a profit.
One is not better than another. People need to take in every side and decide for themselves. Purporting one as better than another is just purely political. There is NO unbiased media. Hasn't been since black and white TVs.
I offer up Trayvon Martin for proof.
(03-15-2013, 07:12 PM)aussiefriend Wrote: You see Duchess, I have set up a thread to discuss something and this troll is behaving just like Riotgear did.
Posts: 12,939
Threads: 288
Joined: Jun 2008
Maybe you and your little dog will like this one better Duchess.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/1...mesticNews
Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
John Adams
|
![[Image: Zy3rKpW.png]](https://i.imgur.com/Zy3rKpW.png)
