(01-11-2023, 08:52 PM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ] (01-11-2023, 08:20 PM)rothschild Wrote: [ -> ]Up to the point where you said "they are nothing alike", which is factually incorrect. Both cases involve classified documents being where they aren't supposed to be. Beyond that they are very dissimilar.
I stand by what I said, rothschild.
I saw that earlier. I'm glad he did and I'm glad it is a trump appointee.
...and I still stand by what I said. My opinion hasn't changed, the two cases are not alike and as always, I don't care if you choose to think they are, that's your business and your argument to make.
(01-12-2023, 05:52 PM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]...and I still stand by what I said. My opinion hasn't changed, the two cases are not alike and as always, I don't care if you choose to think they are, that's your business and your argument to make.
Both cases involve the mishandling of classified documents, so it isn't even arguable that there is a degree of commonality.
(01-11-2023, 08:52 PM).Duchess Wrote: [ -> ] (01-11-2023, 08:20 PM)rothschild Wrote: [ -> ]Up to the point where you said "they are nothing alike", which is factually incorrect. Both cases involve classified documents being where they aren't supposed to be. Beyond that they are very dissimilar.
I stand by what I said, rothschild.
(01-12-2023, 05:52 PM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]...and I still stand by what I said. My opinion hasn't changed, 
the two cases are not alike and as always, I don't care if you choose to think they are, that's your business and your argument to make.
You’re absolutely right, one case is about a guy you loathe, and the other case is about a guy you love!
(01-11-2023, 07:58 PM)MirahM Wrote: [ -> ]srsly. And I was giving Cars the benefit of the doubt that he was just commenting on what the media was focused on. CARS!
Don't you talk to an elder like that, you little twit.
(01-12-2023, 10:13 PM)sally Wrote: [ -> ] (01-11-2023, 07:58 PM)MirahM Wrote: [ -> ]srsly. And I was giving Cars the benefit of the doubt that he was just commenting on what the media was focused on. CARS!
Don't you talk to an elder like that, you little twit.
Shut the fuck up,grandma! Suck on a butterscotch candy.
my stage name was butterscotch candy, made the blue hairs horny.
(01-12-2023, 11:12 PM)BigMark Wrote: [ -> ]my stage name was butterscotch candy, made the blue hairs horny.
My drag stage name was Buttery Cock Candi. Made the straight guys hurl.
(01-12-2023, 11:10 PM)MClang McFly Wrote: [ -> ] (01-12-2023, 10:13 PM)sally Wrote: [ -> ] (01-11-2023, 07:58 PM)MirahM Wrote: [ -> ]srsly. And I was giving Cars the benefit of the doubt that he was just commenting on what the media was focused on. CARS!
Don't you talk to an elder like that, you little twit.
Shut the fuck up,grandma! Suck on a butterscotch candy.
Suck on a lemon you sour geek!
Wait, am I the sour geek?
(01-12-2023, 09:48 PM)Carsman Wrote: [ -> ]You’re absolutely right, one case is about a guy you loathe, and the other case is about a guy you love!
I've never said I love Joe Biden. I've never defended Joe Biden. I'm not defending him having the documents. I'm simply stating that the two cases are different. If you can't see that you have bigger problems than a broken hip.
(01-12-2023, 06:14 PM)rothschild Wrote: [ -> ]Both cases involve the mishandling of classified documents, so it isn't even arguable that there is a degree of commonality.
So who is arguing about the mishandling of them? No one is. You're just looking for something to bitch about.
you double standard hypocrite, i sentence you to two hours under clangs blanket after he eats four taco bell bean and cheese burritos.
Bitch please. 
(01-13-2023, 08:18 AM)BigMark Wrote: [ -> ]you double standard hypocrite, i sentence you to two hours under clangs blanket after he eats four taco bell bean and cheese burritos.
Bitch, please. I eat steak or beef and cheese with jalapenos and spicy sauce. Beans on a burrito? I don't live in a redneck or cowboy county.
(01-13-2023, 05:34 AM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ] (01-12-2023, 09:48 PM)Carsman Wrote: [ -> ]You’re absolutely right, one case is about a guy you loathe, and the other case is about a guy you love!
I've never said I love Joe Biden. I've never defended Joe Biden. I'm not defending him having the documents. I'm simply stating that the two cases are different. If you can't see that you have bigger problems than a broken hip.
You like him though so in your mind he hasn't done anything that needs to be defended.
Oh FFS.
(01-13-2023, 05:34 AM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ] (01-12-2023, 09:48 PM)Carsman Wrote: [ -> ]You’re absolutely right, one case is about a guy you loathe, and the other case is about a guy you love!
I've never said I love Joe Biden. I've never defended Joe Biden. I'm not defending him having the documents. I'm simply stating that the two cases are different. If you can't see that you have bigger problems than a broken hip.
Your blindsided beliefs speak volumes, without having to say the word love!
You can’t see the trees in the forest. And leave my hip outta this mess.
Friggin I-pad won’t let me add to the other post.
And if the cases are different, why do they both have investigating committee’s?