Sweet Brown would definitely agree.
Sweet Cakes definitely would not.
(09-01-2015, 09:27 PM)pyropappy Wrote: [ -> ]If the SC fails to act in her behalf they are admitting she has no 1st amendment freedoms. That is going to open a very serious can of worms.
Oh please. That ridiculous twat was elected to do a job. She KNEW what the job entailed and took it anyway and now she wants to cry and create drama because she doesn't want to give a marriage license to same sex couples. This is bullshit. It's not her place to approve or disapprove all she has to do is give out the goddamn license. Stop with the drama already. She's an adult, if she doesn't want to do the job she should do what adults everywhere do when they don't want to fulfill their job requirements , they leave the job.
Someone who professes to hold marriage in such high regard should probably practice what they preach instead of attempting martyrdom. She's been divorced 3 times with one of those divorces coming while pregnant with a previous husband's twins. Presenting herself like she's so much better than gays. Pfft. 
By age 44, the now 49 year-old woman had been divorced three times and had two children out of wedlock, actions that go against the teachings of most Christian traditions.
Story
(09-02-2015, 08:34 AM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]
By age 44, the now 49 year-old woman had been divorced three times and had two children out of wedlock, actions that go against the teachings of most Christian traditions.
Story
Go back a page and read my post #475 for all the other things she is probably doing against God's law. You cannot pick and choose which law, God's or Man's you are willing to obey
I wonder if the law was changed after she took the job. And I really believe (save da Lord) that she is doing it for the attention, they all are actually even the gay people.
Why doesn't this "born again" elected official have the right to ignore existing law(s)?
It's done all the time by both elected and appointed officials.
Why the outrage because of this cow?
Someone this morning posited a theory that this broad is aiming for public martyrdom so she can get fired, start a go fund me account, and get paid. It ain't a bad play. She gets tons of ultraconservative support and those people throw money at everything they like. Of course that would make her a complete whore and I'm pretty sure the Bible has some rules on that too.
(09-02-2015, 10:08 AM)Maggot Wrote: [ -> ]I wonder if the law was changed after she took the job. And I really believe (save da Lord) that she is doing it for the attention, they all are actually even the gay people.
Hello Maggot, I disagree, it's more like the media presence is distorting this just by being there. I point to the OJ trial as an example.
I think both sides are well intentioned and the media is there for the big story.
Pyropappy: before you quote our founding fathers for religious takes, please refer to google: "founding fathers and deism" for the stunning realization that most of them hated organized religion, considered it a dead or dying practice, and deliberately used non Christian terms like "nature's god" and "their creator" in order to downplay god in government as much as possible under the circumstances. Jefferson, the author of the document you quoted, went so far as to hand-cut and re-paste his entire family bible to remove ALL deity references to the new testament, leaving only the tale of a poor but smarter than average carpenter who said some shit and got killed for it.
Thanks in advance.
Yes, SCOTUS did make ruling after she took office. But does not make her stand right. I think it is all attention seeking. On everyone's part. The gay folks could go to another county, but does that really seem fair? Lots of sides to this whole story. Cannot wait for her and this to go away.
(09-02-2015, 10:48 AM)Ski at 1SKY6 Wrote: [ -> ] (09-02-2015, 10:08 AM)Maggot Wrote: [ -> ]I wonder if the law was changed after she took the job. And I really believe (save da Lord) that she is doing it for the attention, they all are actually even the gay people.
Hello Maggot, I disagree, it's more like the media presence is distorting this just by being there. I point to the OJ trial as an example.
You're preaching to the choir on that one. The media is the bane of society turning things every which way but loose.
(09-02-2015, 10:47 AM)Donovan Wrote: [ -> ]Of course that would make her a complete whore and I'm pretty sure the Bible has some rules on that too.
Or a foot soldier in the "War Against Women".
Jesus hung with whores.
But not at strip clubs.
Jesus the original hippie.
Rowan County Clerks Office = San Francisco
Kimmy Davis = Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi
(09-02-2015, 10:08 AM)Maggot Wrote: [ -> ]I wonder if the law was changed after she took the job. And I really believe (save da Lord) that she is doing it for the attention, they all are actually even the gay people.
Yes, of course, the law changed after she took office. She was elected in November 2014 and the law changed in June 2015.
Before taking office as county clerk in January 2015, Davis swore an oath to support the constitutions and laws of the United States and the Commonwealth of Kentucky.
Well, the United States and the Commonwealth of Kentucky are not obligated to consult with Kim Davis before enacting, modifying or repealing existing laws. She is, however, obligated to uphold current laws, whether she thinks God likes them or not.
I'm not outraged by Kim Davis. I just don't think her defense for refusing to uphold the law and refusing to do her job -- her belief that God opposes gay marriage and she loves her Lord and must be obedient to Him -- is or should be legally compelling in her governmental public service position.
She and the gay couples who keep going back to her asking for a license are each making political statements, I agree. Kim Davis' position conflicts with existing law, whereas the gay couples' requests align with existing law. I think she's going to lose her legal appeal, again.
(09-02-2015, 10:51 AM)Ski at 1SKY6 Wrote: [ -> ]I think both sides are well intentioned and the media is there for the big story.
The "Media" is an "instigating" shit stirring whore, looking to cause controversy where ever it can. They always ask controversial questions, just looking & hoping to spark turmoil.
Many times, they succeed, and many times those involved get the short end of the stick!
(09-02-2015, 11:14 AM)Jimbone Wrote: [ -> ]Rowan County Clerks Office = San Francisco
Kimmy Davis = Sheriff Ross Mirkarimi
That's a valid comparison if you're referring to the Steinle murder case, in my opinion.
Sanctuary cities aren't violating the Constitution or breaking any federal laws by making illegal immigration a low community policing priority and advising officers not to inquire about immigration status.
Ignoring a federal agency's request for cooperation in regards to an illegal immigration case is a violation of federal law, though (as I see it). Sheriff Mirkarimi's refusal to cooperate with ICE when requested was similar to what Kim Davis is now doing. I don't support Mirkarimi's position either.
Unlike Davis, however, I don't believe that (if he stays in office) Mirkarimi will refuse a specific ICE request again or that the city of San Francisco will stand by him if he does. He's already under intense fire by SF mayor Ed Lee for not complying with ICE cooperation regulations (and I think Kathryn Steinle's parents may well win their suit against him).
(09-02-2015, 10:54 AM)Donovan Wrote: [ -> ]Pyropappy: before you quote our founding fathers for religious takes, please refer to google: "founding fathers and deism" for the stunning realization that most of them hated organized religion, considered it a dead or dying practice, and deliberately used non Christian terms like "nature's god" and "their creator" in order to downplay god in government as much as possible under the circumstances. Jefferson, the author of the document you quoted, went so far as to hand-cut and re-paste his entire family bible to remove ALL deity references to the new testament, leaving only the tale of a poor but smarter than average carpenter who said some shit and got killed for it.
Thanks in advance.
Unfortunately you have fallen victim to the progressives deliberate attack to malign our founders and change our history. Check the source material for that stuff, I believe you will find limited use of their actual writings and documents.
John Adams: Signer of the Declaration of Independence, 2
nd President
Quote:The general principles on which the fathers achieved independence were the general principles of Christianity. I will avow that I then believed, and now believe, that those general principles of Christianity are as eternal and immutable as the existence and attributes of God
Quote:Suppose a nation in some distant region should take the Bible for their only law book and every member should regulate his conduct by the precepts there exhibited. . . . What a Eutopia – what a Paradise would this region be
Samuel Adams: Father of the American Revolution, Signer of the Declaration of Independence
Quote:I . . . recommend my Soul to that Almighty Being who gave it, and my body I commit to the dust, relying upon the merits of Jesus Christ for a pardon of all my sins.
Charles Carroll: Signer of the Declaration of Independence
Quote:On the mercy of my Redeemer I rely for salvation and on His merits; not on the works I have done in obedience to His precepts.
John Dickinson: Signer of the Constitution
Quote:Rendering thanks to my Creator for my existence and station among His works, for my birth in a country enlightened by the Gospel and enjoying freedom, and for all His other kindnesses, to Him I resign myself, humbly confiding in His goodness and in His mercy through Jesus Christ for the events of eternity.
Benjamin Rush
igner of the Declaration of Independence
Quote:My only hope of salvation is in the infinite, transcendent love of God manifested to the world by the death of His Son upon the cross. Nothing but His blood will wash away my sins. I rely exclusively upon it. Come, Lord Jesus! Come quickly!
Roger Sherman: Signer of the Declaration of Independence, Signer of the Constitution
Quote:I believe that there is one only living and true God, existing in three persons, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost. . . . that the Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments are a revelation from God. . . . that God did send His own Son to become man, die in the room and stead of sinners, and thus to lay a foundation for the offer of pardon and salvation to all mankind so as all may be saved who are willing to accept the Gospel offer.
George Washington: 1
st President, Master Mason
in his 1
st inaugural address
Quote:it would be peculiarly improper to omit in this first official act my fervent supplications to that Almighty Being Who rules over the universe, Who presides in the councils of nations, and Whose providential aids can supply every human defect – that His benediction may consecrate to the liberties and happiness of the people of the United States a government instituted by themselves for these essential purposes.
Care for a few hundred more?
The problems this country faces was predicted by John Adams:
Quote:Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
Don't forget . . .
Eric Holder encouraged state attorneys general, they didn't need to enforce any law they didn't agree with.
This . . . from a standing US Attorney General!
And the Obama administration refused to recognize the Defense of Marriage Act.
Let the voters who put this woman in office be responsible for her removal.
Or demand the US Supreme Court hear this case.