I have a photograph of T's dead body. It's the real deal & nothing has been blacked out. His eyes are wide open. I hesitate to post it without talking to Hot D first.
I have that pic also Duch. Eyes and mouth both open. I just looked at it and for some reason something caught my eye. Or actually lack of something caught my eye. Where did his skittles and ice tea go? Its not in that pic and I don't remember seeing it in any of the other pics or videos. Someone on another forum said T actually made it home and then came back to take a pop at Z. I did not believe that, but now that I spotted the fact that the tea and skittles are not in the pics it makes me wonder, is this posible? I would hate to think that is what happened, so can someone point out a pic where those items are in it?
I'm pretty sure those items were in his pockets. I recall the cop testifying that she heard the crinkling sound of the skittles when she pulled his hoodie up.
I would have to listen to that video. I just looked at that pic again and there is no way to tell if they are in his pockets. They would almost have to be in his pants pockets because if they would have ben in his hoodie pockets I would think they would have fallen out. I have never had any luck keeping things in the pockets of a hoodie. Let alone something as large as a can of arizona iced tea, they are huge.
Others will be along shortly to assure that those things were indeed in his pockets, had they not been on his person you can count on the fact it would have been all over the internet. Nothing is being hidden in regards to that. The female cop is the one who testified about it so it shouldn't be too hard for you to find her testimony on youtube.
It appears that more than one officer testified about those items being in T's hoodie. Here ya go -
The sergeant testified that he sat the body upright to feel for an exit wound and felt a cold can in Martin’s hooded sweatshirt pocket – the Arizona brand fruit drink he had purchased at a 7-Eleven where he also bought Skittles for a his father’s girlfriend’s young son.
Story
Its not a big deal, I just noticed it and it made me wonder.
I would think the items would be listed in a report also. What report I don't know, but I would think they would be somewhere if they were on his person.
If they were on the ground there should be a #marker by them just like any other crime scene.
(07-13-2013, 07:51 AM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ]
It appears that more than one officer testified about those items being in T's hoodie. Here ya go -
The sergeant testified that he sat the body upright to feel for an exit wound and felt a cold can in Martin’s hooded sweatshirt pocket – the Arizona brand fruit drink he had purchased at a 7-Eleven where he also bought Skittles for a his father’s girlfriend’s young son.
Story
Thanks, that answers that question.
(07-13-2013, 07:51 AM)F.U. Dont ask again Wrote: [ -> ]If they were on the ground there should be a #marker by them just like any other crime scene.
They didn't fall out even while he was attempting to beat the fat assed, lying liar to death. They were discovered by officers in his hoodie. Amazing, huh.
F.U.
There are photos of the contents of Trayvon's pockets which were taken at the scene immediately after the killing.
Why I'm reading recycled conspiracy theory comments like this from another site, at Mock, after the crimes scene evidence has been presented in court is beyond me, but maybe somebody else finds it interesting.
I haven't seen the photo you're referencing. If it was taken before the items were removed, you wouldn't see what was in Trayvon's pockets, obviously.
If it was taken after the items had been removed from Trayvon's pockets, photographed, tagged and bagged, you wouldn't see the items either, obviously.
Duchess, if you want to post that photo in the ZIMMERMAN TRIAL REFERENCE thread, that might be the best place. Those who want to see it can find it there.
(07-13-2013, 07:54 AM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ] (07-13-2013, 07:51 AM)F.U. Dont ask again Wrote: [ -> ]If they were on the ground there should be a #marker by them just like any other crime scene.
They didn't fall out even while he was attempting to beat the fat assed, lying liar to death. They were discovered by officers in his hoodie. Amazing, huh.
While leaning over or forward they would probably stay put in the pockets. They should have fallen out when he fell backwards though. Or if they were rolling around on the ground.
(07-13-2013, 07:57 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: [ -> ]F.U.
Why I'm reading recycled conspiracy theory comments like this from another site, at Mock, after the crimes scene evidence has been presented in court is beyond me,
Just making conversation HotD. I have not keep up with every detail about this case, like some people have. So I asked a question, but hay, no problem, I will just shut up.
(07-13-2013, 07:59 AM)F.U. Dont ask again Wrote: [ -> ]While leaning over or forward they would probably stay put in the pockets. They should have fallen out when he fell backwards though. Or if they were rolling around on the ground.
Yeah, they should have fallen out if they were in a life & death struggle, I agree but that didn't happen, they stayed right where T put them after they were purchased.
(07-13-2013, 08:02 AM)F.U. Dont ask again Wrote: [ -> ] (07-13-2013, 07:57 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: [ -> ]F.U.
Why I'm reading recycled conspiracy theory comments like this from another site, at Mock, after the crimes scene evidence has been presented in court is beyond me,
Just making conversation HotD. I have not keep up with every detail about this case, like some people have. So I asked a question, but hay, no problem, I will just shut up.
Oh geez, don't shut up.
I thought you said earlier you remain undecided after seeing the evidence at trial. If I misunderstood and you don't know what was and wasn't presented, it makes more sense that you'd be asking. Apologies.
Maybe this will help.
-No evidence was presented that Trayvon was associated with anybody else when he was out that night.
-No evidence was presented that he was out to make a drug from Skittles and iced tea.
-No accusation was made that dated/tagged crime scene evidence was planted.
-No suggestion was made when the time line was presented, by either side, that Trayvon had gone into his residence and returned.
Evidence was presented that showed Trayvon had just over 40 dollars, the Skittles, the iced tea, and a red 7-11 lighter on his person when he was killed. His head phones were found near him.
(07-13-2013, 08:02 AM)F.U. Dont ask again Wrote: [ -> ]I will just shut up.
I really wish some of you men would stop saying this. Please.
(07-13-2013, 08:27 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: [ -> ] (07-13-2013, 08:02 AM)F.U. Dont ask again Wrote: [ -> ] (07-13-2013, 07:57 AM)HairOfTheDog Wrote: [ -> ]F.U.
Why I'm reading recycled conspiracy theory comments like this from another site, at Mock, after the crimes scene evidence has been presented in court is beyond me,
Just making conversation HotD. I have not keep up with every detail about this case, like some people have. So I asked a question, but hay, no problem, I will just shut up.
Oh geez, don't shut up.
I thought you said earlier you remain undecided after seeing the evidence at trial. If I misunderstood and you don't know what was and wasn't presented, it makes more sense that you'd be asking. Apologies.
Maybe this will help.
-No evidence was presented that Trayvon was associated with anybody else when he was out that night.
-No evidence was presented that he was out to make a drug from Skittles and iced tea.
-No accusation was made that dated/tagged crime scene evidence was planted.
-No suggestion was made when the time line was presented, by either side, that Trayvon had gone into his residence and returned.
Evidence was presented that showed Trayvon had just over 40 dollars, the Skittles, the iced tea, and a red 7-11 lighter on his person when he was killed. His head phones were found near him.
That is right HotD, I still don't know if he is guilty or not. Mostly because the evidence that I have seen has not pushed me either way. Also,I have had to work so I have not seen all the evidence, so I am trying to find the info by doing searches. Those searches, more times than not,. lead me to other forums [many of them are, as they say, conspiracy forums.] so I read what they have to say there, come back here and ask questions from a group of people that I trust will tell me the details on a subject.
I hope that makes sense.
(07-13-2013, 08:47 AM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ] (07-13-2013, 08:02 AM)F.U. Dont ask again Wrote: [ -> ]I will just shut up.
I really wish some of you men would stop saying this. Please.
You just cant please you women, can ya? Why are you asking this [shut up] . . . dont shut up. Holy shit, whats a man to do???????????? LOL
At least you don't take the stuff on conspiracy sites at face value like some retards do.
Like when that controversial reporter died recently the conspiracy shit hit the fan again at Mock, how disappointing.
(07-13-2013, 08:59 AM)F.U. Dont ask again Wrote: [ -> ] (07-13-2013, 08:47 AM)Duchess Wrote: [ -> ] (07-13-2013, 08:02 AM)F.U. Dont ask again Wrote: [ -> ]I will just shut up.
I really wish some of you men would stop saying this. Please.
You just cant please you women, can ya? Why are you asking this [shut up] . . . dont shut up. Holy shit, whats a man to do???????????? LOL
Keep talking, of course.
I wasn't asking you to shut up. I don't want anyone to shut up.
As I said, I just didn't understand why you'd legitimately be wondering what you were based on the comments at a conspiracy forum if you'd read this thread and seen the evidence at trial.
Appreciate the clarification, makes sense.
(07-13-2013, 09:04 AM)Cynical Ninja Wrote: [ -> ]At least you don't take the stuff on conspiracy sites at face value like some retards do.
Like when that controversial reporter died recently the conspiracy shit hit the fan again at Mock, how disappointing.
I get a laugh when reading some of those sites. Some people are so far out there and they dont even know how far out there they sound.
I had a boss years ago that said ... the smarter we get, the dumber we get. Man was he right!