(03-07-2011, 05:32 PM)van64 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-07-2011, 05:27 PM)ZEROSPHERES Wrote: [ -> ] (03-07-2011, 05:22 PM)NightOwl Wrote: [ -> ]It's not Professional! So must be personal.
I agree, because it sure wasn't "Random". I am convinced LE knows but just dosen't have enough to make the arrest. They need that "Crime Stoppers" call with the right piece of the puzzel to cinch this up.
It's hard to imagine even LE being smug enough to leave a killer or killers on the prowl if they truly do know who did this. They'd find some way to lock them up.
It highly likely the perp(s) have been brought in for questioning and held as long as was "legally" possible.
(03-07-2011, 05:38 PM)AriGold Wrote: [ -> ]Hahahaha, ZEROSPHERES. Nice avatar.
Thanks Ari,
I was considering the Nun.
Didn't Maytee state in her FB post that she knew more than "mockers". I might just be blinded by the 792 pages of thread :O...but I thought she said that...sounds like she may hold the key to what happened if she knows so much. I would love to have her enlighten us on her knowledge. After catching up on all the pages, I have come to the conclusion that Tiffany was an easy target for Maytee. She QUICKLY said to the 911 operator, she set up my son. WHY on earth would you accuse someone that she never met until that night. What facts does Maytee have? DOES ANYONE know if Maytee and John, Sr. are still together???
(03-07-2011, 05:21 PM)van64 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-07-2011, 05:17 PM)JsMom Wrote: [ -> ] (03-07-2011, 04:24 PM)RaisingAPrince Wrote: [ -> ]Sheriff updates double death investigation
Monday, March 07, 2011
TOLEDO, OH -- It's been more than a month since two young people were found dead in a home on Longacre Lane in Springfield Twp.
Today, Lucas Co. sheriff James Telb released an update to the investigation.
Officers believe the couple was targeted and that the killings were not random acts of violence. Neither do they believe this was a "professional hit."
Evidence is being examined, as are polygraph results. Anyone with any information should call 419-213-4917 or Crime Stopper at 419-255-1111.
A reward is offered for information leading to the arrest and conviction of those responsible.
WELL THANK YOU GOD WE HAVE SOME KINDA UPDATE!!! THANKS RAISING A PRINCE!!!!
Well, the sheriff does tell us that polygraphs were administered. We knew that too though.
Van, Least the TRIED! bbooooo!
(03-07-2011, 04:36 PM)onefortheroad Wrote: [ -> ] (03-07-2011, 04:11 PM)van64 Wrote: [ -> ] (03-07-2011, 04:03 PM)onefortheroad Wrote: [ -> ]And professionals might have done that, but I don't think these perps were professional or even very smart, though this crime was so vicious that it wouldn't surprise me if they've killed before. I tend to agree that this was a statement of some kind.
So if it was a professional hit, it almost certainly revolved around drugs. I think everyone here on this thread will agree with that. If it was NOT a professional hit it could have been drugs, robbery, a crime of passion or all three...and a lot of people early on were in agreement that the perp(s) had killed before which would make at least one of them a serial killer...so if it was NOT a professional hit, who do you think the perps have killed before? A friend? A random stranger? Someone in a robbery gone awry?
Someone who got in their way or crossed them, I'd say.
some one wanted their shit......
(03-07-2011, 03:36 PM)Lady Cop Wrote: [ -> ]btw, i am getting really tired of the obese girl's photo showing up every page. [/b]
Me too. Loading that picture multiple times sucked so much bandwidth out of my router that it knocked my Roku off line in the middle of Puccini's La Boheme.
(03-07-2011, 06:36 PM)Methusala Wrote: [ -> ] (03-07-2011, 03:36 PM)Lady Cop Wrote: [ -> ]btw, i am getting really tired of the obese girl's photo showing up every page. [/b]
Me too. Loading that picture multiple times sucked so much bandwidth out of my router that it knocked my Roku off line in the middle of Puccini's La Boheme.
I venture that it would not have happened if you had been listening to
Verde's Rigoletto.
IMO about what spectulation of whos blood is all over....They took knives out of the home as part of the evidence. I think Lisa or Johnny might have got a cut or stab in on one of the perps. Possibly Lisa did and that is why they brutalized her like they did. I am saying "they" because I think there had to have been more than one.
We haven't heard from Jash in a long time. Wonder why?
Sure wish the local news media would interview Johnny's father and Lisa's father. It would be interesting to hear their opinions. I can say on here "KEEP THE FAITH!"
Cordray on Lucas County Sheriff charging for PSAP
Lucas County Prosecutor Julia Bates asked for a legal opinion from Attorney General Richard Cordray on the topic of Lucas County being able to charge for public safety answering point (PSAP). You can read the full opinion at this LINK.
In essence, the County can not:
Not only does a county sheriff lack express statutory authority to charge a township that is served by a PSAP operated by the sheriff a fee for receiving 9-1-1 calls and dispatching police and fire personnel to respond to 9-1-1 calls in the township, but to conclude that a sheriff may do so pursuant to a contract for road patrol services would be inconsistent with the provisions of law governing the funding of PSAPs.
The basic summary:
In conclusion, it is my opinion, and you are hereby advised as follows:
1. A county sheriff who operates a public safety answering point may not charge a township that is served by the public safety answering point a fee for receiving 9-1-1 calls and dispatching police and fire personnel to respond to 9-1-1 calls in the township when the sheriff and township have entered into a contract whereby the sheriff provides road patrol services to the township.
2. A county sheriff who operates a public safety answering point and township that is served by the public safety answering point may not enter into a contract whereby the township pays the sheriff for receiving 9-1-1 calls and dispatching police and fire personnel to respond to 9-1-1 calls in the township.
3. Pursuant to R.C. 4931.45, a county’s final 9-1-1 plan may be amended to require a township that is served by a public safety answering point operated by the county sheriff to pay a portion of the costs associated with operating the public safety answering point through an addendum approved by a majority of a 9-1-1 planning committee, provided the addendum does not change the source of funding as between the alternatives set forth in R.C. 4931.43(B)(5).
4. Pursuant to R.C. 4931.45(B), an amendment to a county’s final 9-1-1 plan that changes the source of funding for a county sheriff’s public safety answering point as between the alternatives set forth in R.C. 4931.43(B)(5) must be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in R.C. 4931.42-.44.
While the opinion does not state what needs to be done with any money that was improperly charged as fees, it’s been assumed that the Townships that paid Lucas County will seek to have that money refunded. What impact this will have on Lucas County and the budget for the Sheriff’s department remains to be seen.
http://glasscityjungle.com/2010/08/cordr...-for-psap/
Monday, March 7, 2011
(Thought this was interesting and in some way possibly relevant?)