Mock

(02-27-2012, 11:06 AM)Snoopy Wrote: [ -> ]But you are right Duchess, not everyone with bipolar is on disability!

Thank you. That was an awesome post & I appreciate you taking the time to share your personal insight.

So in other words her kids should be taken away from her because she could control her disability but chooses not to and thus puts them in danger.

(02-29-2012, 02:18 AM)MikeyA Wrote: [ -> ]So in other words her kids should be taken away from her because she could control her disability but chooses not to and thus puts them in danger.

Her kids should be taken away from her because she's a fucking lunatic!

What has set her off, something or nothing?

OTD...Her own delusions?

Do you think she is upset because someone stole her van?

I DON'T KNOW IF THIS WAS ALREADY POSTED HERE!!!!!! LC, do what you want with it.

2/29/2012 1 Title : MIS:CORRESPONDENCE FILED
FILED BY PROSECUTOR
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 2 Title : MTN:FOR CHANGE OF VENUE FILED
(DEFENSE MOTION # 40)
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 3 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
TO HAVE REASONS FOR DEFENSE OBJECTIONS AND REASONS FOR
OVERRULING DEFENSE OBJECTIONS PLACED ON THE RECORD
(DEFENSE MOTION # 41)
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 4 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
TO PROHIBIT ANY REFERENCES TO THE FIRST OF THESE
PROCEEDINGS AS THE "GUILT PHASE" (DEFENSE MOTION #42)
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 5 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
COURTROOM DECORUM ORDER (DEFENSE MOTION # 43)
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 6 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
FOR APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL PROCESS SERVER
(DEFENSE MOTION # 44)
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 7 Title : MTN:IN LIMINE FILED
REGARDING OHIO R. EVID 803(8) : LIMITED ADMISSIBILITY OF
LAW ENFORCEMENT RECORDS (DEFENSE MOTION #45)
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 8 Title : PLD:MEMORANDUM
DEF'S TRIAL MEMO REGARDING THE INADMISSIBILITY OF
PURPORTED " PRIOR CONSISTENT STATEMENTS" UNDER RULE
801(D)(1)(b) (DEFENSE MOTION # 46)
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 9 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
TO AVOID COERCIVE PRACTICES DURING MITIGATION PHASE
DELIBERATIONS (DEFENSE MOTION # 47)
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 10 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
MTN FOR WRITTEN JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND AN OPPORTUNITY TO
REVIEW THEM BEFORE JURY IS INSTRUCTED (DEFENSE MOTION # 48)
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 11 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
DEF'S REQUESTED PRELIMINARY AND FINAL MITIGATION PHASE JURY
INSTRUCTIONS (DEFENSE MOTION # 49)
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 12 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
DEF'S AUTHORITY FOR DEF'S REQUESTED JURY INSTRUCTIONS:
MITIGATION PHASE (DEFENSE MOTION #50)
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 13 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
TO RECOGNIZE MERCY AS MITIGATING FACTOR
(DEFENSE MOTION # 51)
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 14 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
FOR INSTRUCTION THAT THE DEF BEARS NO BURDEN OF PROOF AT
MITIGATION PHASE (DEFENSE MOTION #52)
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 15 Title : MTN:TO DISMISS FILED
CAPITAL COMPONENTS (DEFENSE MOTION #39)
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 16 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
DEF'S MTN TO MAKE THE STATE'S PHYSICAL EVIDENCE AVAILABLE
TO DEF FOR INSPECTION AND SCIENTIFIC TESTING BY DEF'S
EXPERTS (DEFENSE MOTION #38)
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 17 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
DEF'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER DIRECTING THAT A COMPLETE COPY
OF THE PROSECUTOR'S FILE BE MADE AND TURNED OVER TO THE
COURT FOR REVIEW AND BE SEALED FOR APPELLATE REVIEW, IF
NECESSARY (DEFENSE MOTION # 37)
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 18 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
FOR PRETRIAL DISCLOSURE OF OHIO R.CRIM.P.16(B)(1)(g)
STATEMENTS (DEFENSE MOTION NO.:35)
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 19 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
MTN FOR DISCLOSURE OF REBUTTAL WITNESSES
(DEFENSE MOTION # 36)
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 20 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
DEF'S MTN FOR DISCLOSURE OF EXCULPATORY AND IMPEACHMENT
EVIDENCE (DEFENSE MOTION # 34)
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 21 Title : MTN:REQ FOR BILL OF PARTICULAR
(DEFENSE MOTION # 33)
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 22 Title : MTN:FOR DISCOVERY FILED
SUPPLEMANTAL
(DEFENSE MOTION # 32)
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 23 Title : MTN:TO DISMISS FILED
CAPITAL SPECIFICATIONS
MTN #D31
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 24 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
FOR INDIVIDUAL SEQUESTERED VOIR DIRE ON DEATH PENALTY,
PUBLICITY AND OTHER ISSUES
MTN # D30
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 25 Title : MTN:TO COMPEL FILED
DISCLOSURE OF AGGRAVATING FACTORS AND INFORMATION RELATING
TO MITIGATING FACTORS MTN # D29
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 26 Title : MTNUPPRESS FILED
SEARCH OF DEF'S RESIDENCE
MTN # D28
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 27 Title : MTNUPPRESS FILED
SEARCH OF DEFENDANT
MTN # D27
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 28 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
TO EXTEND FILING DEADLINE FOR MOTIONS RELATED TO MENTAL
RETARDATION MTN # D26
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 29 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
TO PROHIBIT THE PROSECUTOR FROM ARGUING AND THE COURT
GIVING INSTRUCTIONS REGARDING STATUTORY MITIGATING FACTORS
NOT RAISED BY THE DEFENSE
MTN # D25
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 30 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
TO INSTRUCT THE JURORS ON THE SPECIFIC MITIGATING FACTORS
RAISED BY THE DEFENSE
MTN # D24
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 31 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
TO INSTRUCT THE JURORS THAT THEY MAY CONSIDER RESIDUAL
DOUBT AS A MITIGATING FACTOR
MTN # D23
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 32 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
REQUESTED PRELIMINARY JURY INSTRUCTIONS
MTN # D22
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 33 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
TO ALLOW DEFENSE TO ARGUE LAST AT MITIGATION PHASE
MTN # D21
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 34 Title : MTN:IN LIMINE FILED
REGARDING OHIO R.EVID.803(18)
MTN # D20
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 35 Title : MTN:TO COMPEL FILED
DISCLOSURE OF STATE'S JURY SELECTION DATA
MTN # D19
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 36 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
FOR JURY VIEW
MTN # D18
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 37 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
TO RESTRAIN CERTAIN PARTIES FROM DISCUSSING THE CASE WITH
DEFENDANT
MTN # D17
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 38 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
TO RECORD ALL SIDE BAR PROCEEDINGS
MTN # D16
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 39 Title : MTN:FOR RELIEF FILED
FROM PAYMENT OF FEES RELATED TO THE ISSUANCE OF DEFENSE
SUBPOENAS
MTN # D15
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 40 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
FOR COURT TO REVIEW PROSECUTING ATTORNEY'S DECISION OF
NON-DISCLOSURE OF MATERIAL
MTN # D14
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 41 Title : MTN:TO COMPEL FILED
THE STATE TO PRODUCE A MEANINGFUL LIST OF ALL THE WITNESSES
THE STATE INTENDS TO CALL AT TRIAL
MTN # D13
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 42 Title : MTN:TO COMPEL FILED
THE STATE TO PRODUCE A MEANINGFUL LIST OF ALL THE
WITNESSES THE STATE INTENDS TO CALL AT TRIAL
MTN #D 13
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 43 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
TO PROPERLY CATALOG ALL PHYSICAL EVIDENCE
MTN # D12
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 44 Title : MTN:TO COMPEL FILED
LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS TO TURN OVER AND ADVISE THE
PROSECUTING ATTORNEY OF ALL INFORMATION ACQUIRED DURING THE
COURSE OF INVESTIGATION
MTN # D 11
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 45 Title : MTN:TO COMPEL FILED
DISCLOSURE OF AGGRAVATING FACTORS AND INFORMATION RELATING
TO MITIGATING FACTORS
MTN # D 10
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 46 Title : MTN:MOTION FILED
OF STATE'S EVIDENCE PURSUANT TO OHIO R. CRIM.P. 12(D)(2)
STATEMENTS
MTN # D9
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

2/29/2012 47 Title : PLDUPPLEMENTAL
FILED BY PROSECUTOR
PARTY : D1 - WILLIAMS SAMUEL TODD

Older Than Dirt, just posted up the latest Toledo Blade News and Court Motions I counted up about 40 of them in or around that figure. Thanks!!

The best thing to do is view all the scanned documents click on public documents up on the left hand corner all the documents will appear and double click on each one to read more, here's one item of interest dated February 29^th 2012 addressed to the BCI, Please be advised on February 16^th 2012, Attorneys for Samuel Williams & on February 28^th, 2012 the Attorneys for Cameo Pettaway in the above - styled cases have consented on-the-record, the BCI may conduct DNA testing & Consumption of the following samples:-

Swabs from Garage Door Opener
Swabs from Handle of Knife
Swabs from Blade of Knife
Swabs from Tape
Swabs from Zip-Lock Baggie
Swabs from Black Duct Tape and Plastic
Swabs from Duct Tape and T-shirt
Swabs from Envelopes
Swabs from White Plastic Bag
Swabs from White Plastic Bag
Swabs from TGIF Shirt
Swabs from Inside Pocket Lining

The Defendant Motion for Change of Venue #40 if you click on that scanned document Williams doesn't feel he'd have a fair trial in Lucas County due to all the publicity The Blade, True Crime Report & more are mentioned including a picture of Johnny's grave.

I didn't thinked that you were allowed to be away!!haha But, I knew that you would have something to add. Good resources you have!!!!!!

Lucas County judges typically don't grant change of venue. The last 6yrs there have been two high profile cases where there probably should have been. 1) Tom Noe. Central figure in Ohio Coingate scandal that brought down Gov. Bob Taft and the Ohio GOP. GOP lost all but one statewide elected office in 2006 due to his stealing money from a state fund. Serving 18yrs in Hocking Correctional Facility. 2) Father Gerald Robinson. Priest who was convicted of murdering Sister Margaret Ann Pahl. Also in Hocking! Serving a 15-life sentence. Judge Tom Osowik ironically was the judge in both of these cases. Said to the prosecution and defense team that they should try and seat a jury.

Doubt they win that change of venue.

Robinson and Noe probably should have been granted a change of venue IMO. The Blade really damaged them and made it almost impossible for them to get a fair trial.

Am I reading this right? They never indicted destiny?
EVENT
1/27/2012 1 Title : OPNYLVANIA TRANSCRIPT FILED
OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE
PARTY : DN1 - MADRID DESTINY
1/27/2012 2 Title : BND:TRANSCRIPT BOND
MUNICIPAL COURT BOND SET AT
$500,000.00 NO 10% & NO PROPERTY BOND
PARTY : DN1 - MADRID DESTINY
2/23/2012 1 Title : CLS:NO INDICTMENT FOUND
OBSTRUCT JUSTICE
PARTY : DN1 - MADRID DESTINY

Disclaimer : The public record information available here reflects the docket entries and journals required by Ohio law to be kept by the Lucas County Clerk of the Court of Common Pleas. This information reflects the actual documents filed and kept at the Clerk of Courts Legal Division, located in the Lucas County Courthouse, at Adams and Erie Streets in Toledo, Ohio, 43624. The data entry, though generally deemed reliable, cannot be guaranteed. The information may appear on the Internet Docket before the entry is actually signed and journalized. Of course the proposed action is official only when signed and journalized. In no event shall the Lucas County Clerk of the Court of Common Pleas, or any other Lucas County department, agency, or official be held liable for damage of any nature, direct or indirect, arising from the use of this Internet product; including loss of profits, loss of savings, or other incidental or consequential damages.

(03-06-2012, 11:27 AM)Bella0213 Wrote: [ -> ]Am I reading this right? They never indicted destiny?

Maybe that it what set Maytee off. The dates line up. Maytee started ranting on the 24^th.

That could be it. Or Maytee could have just decided to not take the little yellow pill that day.

Yeah looks to me destiny didn't get indicted!! Hmmmm...